Jurisdictional Limitations: Attributional Nexus focuses on the expansion of traditional nexus principles by state tax administrators in their continued quest for revenue. While there are numerous restraints on the ability of state tax administrators to widen the scope of their jurisdiction to tax, the most effective restraints are the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clauses and the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This Portfolio, written by Arthur R. Rosen, Esq., a partner in the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery, discusses various applications of both Commerce and Due Process Clause principles in the specific area of states' jurisdiction to tax foreign entities.
In addition, this Portfolio provides analysis and discussion of numerous cases and rulings in which states attempted to assert attributional or affiliate nexus on the basis that a business entity has an agency, alter ego, or unitary relationship with an entity that has direct nexus with a particular state. These issues become most pronounced when related corporations are involved and are the principal focus of this Portfolio.
Consequently, this Portfolio first presents a two-dimensional model that can be utilized for analyzing state tax jurisdictional questions. Then, utilizing that model, the Portfolio discusses the most important aspects of the traditional jurisdiction rules as they relate to presence and transactional nexus. Finally, the Portfolio discusses developments—some of which are or should be quite alarming to taxpayers and their representatives—in attributional nexus.
Jurisdictional Limitations: Attributional Nexus allows you to benefit from:
This Portfolio is part of the Premier State Tax Library, a comprehensive series, which covers major state tax transactions and issues with expert, in-depth analysis, and offers commentary on a wide range of multi-state and state-specific taxation topics, including Sales and Use, Corporate Income, Individual Income, Property, Gross Receipts, Limitations on States' Authorities to Tax, Credits and Incentives, Electronic Commerce, Mergers and Acquisitions, Procedure and Administration, Special Industries, and more.
Detailed Analysis
1430.01. ATTRIBUTIONAL NEXUS
A. Introduction
1430.02. PRESENCE NEXUS V. TRANSACTIONAL NEXUS
B. Transactional Nexus: The Connection Between State and Transaction
C. Presence Nexus: The Connection Between the State and the Corporation
D. The Two Nexus Requirements Need Not Be Related
E. The Relationship of Tax Nexus to In Personam Jurisdiction
F. The Presence Nexus Requirement and Its Application To Various Taxes
G. Unitary Apportionment
1430.03. THE CURRENT STANDARD OF PRESENCE NEXUS
Introductory Material
A. Historical Background
1. Activities Within State
2. Tangible Property in a State
3. Intangible Property in a State
B. Post–Quill Developments
1. Sales and Use Taxes
2. Other Taxes
1430.04. APPLICATIONS OF ATTRIBUTIONAL NEXUS
A. Background
B. The Agency Relationship As a Basis for Attributional Nexus
1. Non–Tax Authorities
2. Tax Authorities
a. The Book Club Cases
b. Direct Marketing Computer Companies and Provision of In-State Warranty Services
c. Electronic Commerce Companies and Provision of Customer Service by In-State Subsidiary
d. Nexus By Affiliation Statutes and Cases
(1) Current, Inc. v. California State Bd. of Equalization
(2) G.P. Group, Inc. v. Missouri Director of Revenue
(3) SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Tracy
C. The Alter Ego Basis for Attributional Nexus
D. The Unitary Basis for Attributional Nexus
1430.05. CONCLUSION
Working Papers
Table of Worksheets
Worksheet 1 Geoffrey, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission 437 S.E.2d 13 (S.C. 1993)
Opinion
Worksheet 2 Nexus Program Bulletin, NB 95–1 Computer Company's Provision of In-State Repair Services Creates Nexus
Bibliography