Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

A Strategic Approach to SEC Investigations (Portfolio 5504)

Product Code: TPOR45
$400.00 Print
Add To Cart
E-mailE-mail
PrintPrint
QuestionsQuestions
ShareShare

Description

A Strategic Approach to SEC Investigations, written by Leonard W. Wang, Esq., Former Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement at the SEC,  discusses strategic considerations for a company under investigation by the SEC for financial reporting problems.  

This Portfolio focuses on evaluating the company's risks and developing a strategy to preserve the value of the company's corporate franchise to the fullest extent possible for the benefit of shareholders and other investors. The dangers of defending the company without fully understanding its legal exposure are described. The importance of self-evaluation, particularly by means of a properly conducted internal investigation, is emphasized. 

A Strategic Approach to SEC Investigations discusses the SEC's policy of rewarding cooperation by companies under investigation, and its policy of penalizing lack of cooperation. It also explains the sanctions available to the SEC and the process for settling with the SEC.  

The Portfolio presents a paradigm for determining the appropriate strategy for defending the company. This Portfolio is organized according to the timeline of major steps in a typical SEC investigation.  

First, this Portfolio details the beginning of the investigation, then its middle stages, and then the final stages of the investigation, including possible sanctions and their collateral consequences.  

This Portfolio also discusses the Wells process, settlements of investigations, and important strategic considerations. For the reader's convenience, the worksheets reproduce pertinent documents from the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice. These documents include reports of investigations, settlement agreements with companies, and press releases. 

Written primarily for the benefit of the executive management and directors of public companies, this Portfolio emphasizes strategic issues from the standpoint of individuals responsible for managing a business and preserving shareholder value.  

Securities law attorneys will appreciate that this Portfolio covers an enormous range of topics within the body of the federal securities laws and should understand that the citation of cases and other authorities herein is illustrative, not comprehensive.  

This Portfolio is intended first and foremost to be a practical aide to the management and directors of public companies, and not a traditional legal treatise. In the interest of making the issues discussed herein accessible to nonlawyers, this Portfolio is written in the vernacular, and gives preference to comprehensibility for the layperson over technical legal precision.  

A Strategic Approach to SEC Investigations allows you to benefit from: 

  • Hundreds of hours of original research on specific tax planning topics from leading practitioners in this area.
  • Invaluable practice documents including tables, charts and lists.
  • Guidance from world-class experts.
  • Real-world and in-depth analysis that lets you explore various options.
  • Time-saving access to relevant sections of tax laws, regulations, court cases, IRS documents and more.
  • Alternative approaches to both common and unique tax scenarios. 

This Portfolio is included in the Accounting Policy & Practice Series, a comprehensive series of titles which explain, explicate, and offer commentary on a wide range of accounting and financial management topics, including revenue recognition, income taxes, leasing, business combinations, debt instruments, risk management, internal controls and more.

Table of Contents

Detailed Analysis

I. Introduction, Scope, and Purposes of Portfolio

A. Potential Significance and Consequences of an SEC Investigation

B. Focus of Portfolio

II. The Beginning of the Investigation

A. How Investigations Begin

1. Informal Inquiries

2. Formal Investigations

3. Scope of Investigations

4. Investigations Leading to Enforcement Actions

B. First, Establish Internal Control

1. Necessity of Safeguarding Records

2. Potential for Obstruction of Justice Charges

a. Instruct Personnel to Freeze Relevant Records

b. Instruct Personnel to Speak Only With Counsel

c. Be Alert to Regulatory Inquiries

3. SEC Recordkeeping Requirements

4. Notify the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors

5. Governance Considerations for the Investigation

6. Stop Ongoing Misconduct

7. Disclose the Misconduct and Correct Filings

C. Disclosing the Investigation

1. Antifraud Rules

2. Periodic Reports and Registered Sales of Securities

3. Regulation FD

4. Market Rules

5. Summary of Disclosure of an Investigation

III. The Middle Stages of the Investigation

Introductory Material

A. Evaluate the Company's Potential Exposure

1. The Drexel Case

2. Seaboard Corporation

3. Summary of the Need for Self-Evaluation

B. Considerations for Internal Investigations

1. Delay Can Mean Lost Opportunity

2. Do Not Presume to Know the Facts

3. Assume the SEC Could Receive the Fruits of the Internal Investigation

a. Ensure the Bona Fides of the Internal Investigation

(1) The Investigators Should Be Disinterested

(2) Endeavor to Be Thorough

(a) Gather Evidence From Multiple Sources

(b) Follow the Evidence

(c) Provide Full Informational Access

(d) Instruct Employees to Cooperate With the Internal Investigation

(e) Be Careful With Employees Who Testify Adversely

(f) Provide Substantial Funding for the Internal Investigation

b. Protect the Integrity of the Internal Investigation

(1) Investigate Confidentially

(2) Protect Against Retaliation in the Internal Investigation

(3) Encourage Employees to Speak Up in Good Faith

(4) Sanction Bad Faith Accusations

(5) Punish Liars

(6) Protect the Documentary Trail

c. Advise Employees That This is Serious

(1) Allow Employees to Retain Their Own Counsel

(2) Caution Witnesses About the Consequences of Untruthfulness

d. Summary for Internal Investigations

e. Take Prompt Remedial Action

C. Multiple Investigations

D. Other Regulators May Monitor the SEC Investigation

E. General Considerations for Investigations

1. Providing the SEC With Information

a. General Authority

b. How Not to Handle Document Production

(1) E-mails

(2) Compliance Reviews

(3) Compliance and Supervision Documents

c. How the SEC Staff Deals With Failure to Comply With Subpoenas

(1) Subpoena Enforcement in Federal Court

(2) Penalties for Lack of Cooperation

(3) Outflanking Recalcitrant Parties

(4) Civil Protective Orders

(5) Summary of Subpoena Compliance

d. Third Party Access to Documents Provided to the SEC

(1) Third Party Access Through the SEC

(2) Third Party Access From the Company Itself

e. Summation: Providing the SEC With Information

2. Keep the Tone Professional

3. Avoid an Adversarial Tone

4. Be Careful With Internal Lobbying

5. Do Not Lobby the Commissioners

6. Do Not Lobby the White House or Congress

a. The Administration

b. Congress

c. Summary Regarding Outside Lobbying

F. Cooperation

1. Negotiating Immunity in Exchange for Cooperation

2. Cooperating Unilaterally for Leniency

3. The Nature of Cooperation With the SEC

4. Can a Company Benefit From Relying on the Seaboard 21(a) Report?

a. Avoiding Charges by Cooperating

b. Obtaining Reduced Sanctions Through Cooperation

5. Considerations Relating to Cooperation

a. Waiver of Privileges

(1) Revealing a Roadmap of the Violations

(2) Confidentiality Agreements

(3) Bear in Mind the Scope of the Waiver

b. Indemnification for Employees

(1) Indemnification May Be Unavailable for Some Employees

(2) Review D& O and Other Liability Coverage

6. Impact of Cooperation on Criminal Exposure

7. The Importance of an Internal Investigation

G. The Potential Price of Being Uncooperative

1. Penalties for Lack of Cooperation

a. Early Development of the Policy

b. The AIG Case: An Illuminating Comparison

c. The Lucent and Symbol Cases: Illustrations of the Concerns

d. The Gemstar Case: A Black Sheep in the Flock?

e. Other Cases of Lack of Cooperation in the Investigation

f. Impact of 2006 Policy Statement on Penalties

2. Overcoming an Early Lack of Cooperation

3. Summary Regarding Lack of Cooperation

IV. The End Game

Introductory Material

A. The Wells Process

1. The Basic Process

2. Should the Company Disclose the Wells Notice?

3. A Wells Submission Can Make a Difference

a. Try to Obtain All the Material Facts

b. Address the Staff's Proposed Case

c. Keep It Short

d. Make It Readable

e. Remember That You're Not in Litigation, Yet

4. Risks of a Wells Submission

a. A Wells Submission Is Not Confidential

b. Assume That a Wells Submission Can Be Used Against the Company

c. The Commission May Read the Wells Submission Even if the Company Wishes to Settle

5. Summary of Wells Submissions

6. Efforts to Preempt the Wells Process

B. Sanctions

1. The Choice of Forum

2. Sanctions in Federal Court

a. The Injunction

(1) Statutory Injunctions

(2) Additional Injunctive Relief

(3) Violation of an Injunction

b. Disgorgement

c. Civil Monetary Penalties

(1) General Civil Penalties

(a) How Are Penalties Determined?

(b) To Whom Are Penalties Paid?

(2) Civil Penalties for Insider Trading

(3) Civil Penalties for Anti-Bribery Violations

(4) Time Limitation on Penalties

d. Ancillary Relief

e. The Officer and Director Bar

f. Temporary Freeze Authority for Extraordinary Payments

3. Administrative Sanctions

a. Cease-and-Desist Orders

b. Accounting and Disgorgement

c. Stop Order

(1) Statutory Authorization

(2) Take No Comfort From the Absence of a Stop Order

d. De-Registration of the Company's Securities

e. Trading Suspension

f. Administrative Officer and Director Bar

g. Sanctioning Professionals

4. Collateral Consequences of Sanctions

a. Safe Harbor for Forward Looking Statements

b. Availability of Certain Private Placement Regulations

c. Investment Advisers

d. Small Business Investment Companies

e. Disclosure of Sanctions

5. An Alternative to Sanctions: The 21(a) Report

C. Settlement

1. When to Start Discussing Settlement

2. Focus of Settlement Discussions

a. Look for Evidentiary Weaknesses

b. Analyze the Basis for the Proposed Sanctions

(1) The SEC has the Burden of Proof

(2) Do Not Rely on Supposed Benchmarks

(3) The SEC Takes a Regulatory Perspective on Sanctions

c. Legal Arguments

d. Policy Arguments

3. Settlements Must Be Approved by the Commission

4. Settlement Without Admitting or Denying

a. The Policy

b. Use of an SEC Settlement as Evidence

c. Avoid Making Public Statements Denying Liability

5. Remedial Undertakings

6. Corporate Settlements With the U.S. DOJ

a. The Deferred Prosecution Agreement

b. Avoiding Prosecution

7. Cooperation With Continuing Government Investigations

8. Additional Settlement Steps

a. Certification of Completion of Document Production

b. Placing Payments in Escrow

c. The SEC Expects Penalties to Penalize in Full

d. Review of Charging Documents and Publicity

(1) Review the Charging Documents

(2) Review the SEC's Publicity

(3) Let the SEC Review the Company's Publicity

e. Control the Company's Publicity

f. Press Conferences for Major Cases

9. Coordinate Settlements, if Possible

10. And What of the Officers, Directors, and Employees?

D. Comments: Strategic Considerations

1. The Internal Investigation Shows No Liability

2. The Internal Investigation Uncovers Substantial Wrongdoing

a. Consider a Cooperative Approach

b. The Risks of Not Cooperating

c. Taking the Seaboard Approach

d. Consider Negotiating an Agreement for Cooperation

3. Navigating the Gray Area

E. Maintain Vigilance After the Settlement

1. Fulfill the Undertakings

2. Fix the Problem(s) the SEC Did Not Discover

3. Fix Newly Discovered Problems

V. Conclusion

Working Papers

TABLE OF WORKSHEETS

Worksheet 1 Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 and Commission Statement on the Relationship of Cooperation to Agency Enforcement Decisions, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44969 (Oct. 23, 2001)

Worksheet 2 U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Manual, Title 9, Criminal Resource Manual § 162, Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations (February 2003)

Worksheet 3 Letter Agreement Between U.S. Department of Justice and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., (Sept. 17, 2003)

Worksheet 4 Joint Press Release, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, New York Attorney General, North American Securities Administrators Association, National Association of Securities Dealers, and New York Stock Exchange, Ten of Nation's Top Investment Firms Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Conflicts of Interest Between Research and Investment Banking (April 28, 2003)

Worksheet 5 American International Group, Inc. Agrees to Pay $126 Million to Settle Fraud Charges Arising Out of Its Offer and Sale of an Earnings Management Product, Press Release No. 2004-163 (Nov. 30, 2004)

Worksheet 6 SEC v. Lehman Brothers Inc., 03 CV 2940 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. April 28, 2003), Consent of Defendant Lehman Brothers Inc. at ¶ 20

Worksheet 7 SEC Charges Time Warner with Fraud, Aiding and Abetting Frauds by Others, and Violating a Prior Cease-and-Desist Order; CFO, Controller, And Deputy Controller Charged With Causing Reporting Violations, Press Release No. 2005-38 (March 21, 2005)

Worksheet 8 Lucent Settles SEC Enforcement Action Charging Company with $1.1 Billion Accounting Fraud, Press Release No. 2004-67 (May 17, 2004)

Worksheet 9 Symbol Technologies Agrees to Settle SEC Enforcement Action Charging Company with Accounting Fraud, Press Release No. 2004-74 (June 3, 2004)

Worksheet 10 SEC Charges American International Group, Inc. and Others in Brightpoint Securities Fraud, Press Release No. 2003-111 (Sept. 11, 2003)

Worksheet 11 List of Significant Accounting Pronouncements Principally Discussed

Bibliography

OFFICIAL

Statutes:

Regulations:

Securities and Exchange Commission:

SEC Forms

SEC Administrative Proceedings

SEC Reports

SEC Staff Action

SEC Staff Bulletins

SEC Litigation Releases

SEC Press Releases

SEC Speeches

Court Cases:

Pleadings

Materials From Court Proceedings

Federal Rules

U.S. Department of Justice Materials:

U. S. Attorney's Manual

DOJ Letter Agreements

DOJ Press Releases

Bureau of Labor Statistics

UNOFFICIAL

New York Stock Exchange

National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

American Stock Exchange

Bar Association Rules

Arbitration

Bureau of National Affairs

Corporate Materials

News Media:

The Arizona Republic

Associated Press

CFO Magazine

CNN

New York Law Journal

New York Magazine

The New York Times

TheStreet.com

Time Magazine

The Wall Street Journal

The Washington Lawyer

The Washington Post

Books

Authors

A.L. Spitzer
A.L. Spitzer, Esq., Boston College Law School, J.D. (magna cum laude) (1981); Yale University, B.A. (1974); formerly attorney advisor and then Special Assistant to the Assistant Treasury Secretary for Tax Policy, Office of Tax Policy of the U.S. Treasury in Washington, D.C. (1986–1988); chairs annual Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Nonprofit Law Conference; Chair of the College and University Subcommittee of the American Bar Association Tax Section Committee on Exempt Organizations; past Co-Chair of Unrelated Business Taxable Income Subcommittee of Exempt Organizations Committee of ABA Tax Section; past Chair of Tax Section of National Association of College and University Attorneys; adjunct professor of Taxation, Boston College Law School; Lecturer in the Law, Harvard Law School. 
Leonard Wang
Leonard W. Wang, B.A. (Economics and Political Science) and J.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison, elected to Phi Beta Kappa, Phi Kappa Phi, the Order of the Coif, and the editorial board of the Wisconsin Law Review; member, the District of Columbia Bar and the State Bar of Wisconsin.  Mr. Wang formerly served as Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. During a 22-year career with the SEC, Mr. Wang received the Chairman's Award for Excellence, the Stanley Sporkin Award, the Capital Markets Award, and the Division of Enforcement Director's Award.