Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

State Environmental Taxes (Portfolio 1690)

Product Code: TPOR44
$400.00 Print
Add To Cart

State Environmental Taxes focuses on the state environmental tax issues faced by a variety of potential taxpayers: waste and hazardous substance generators and disposers, owners and operators of storage and treatment facilities, waste and hazardous substance transporters, and manufacturers and retailers of products deemed a hazard to the environment. Written by Charles J. Moll, III, Esq., Winston & Strawn LLP, Edwin P. Antolin, Esq., Silverstein & Pomerantz, LLP, and C. James Judson, Esq., Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, this Portfolio provides an analysis of the constitutional limitations on states in imposing environmental taxes and fees, the federal tax treatment of environmental remediation expenditures, and the property tax consequences of environmental contamination, including market loss, unmarketability of contaminated property, and valuation issues. 

The authors pay special attention to California's complicated and changing regulation of hazardous substances, and they provide a state-by-state analysis of important environmental tax areas, including: 

  • Hazardous waste fees and taxes,
  • Petroleum products taxes,
  • Underground storage tank tax,
  • Nuclear facility and waste fees,
  • Sewerage tax,
  • Solid waste fees, and
  • Vehicle tire tax. 

Finally, this Portfolio discusses the imposition of “litter” taxes on manufacturers and retailers and of taxes on the sale of new tires.

State Environmental Taxes allows you to benefit from: 

  • Hundreds of hours of original research on specific tax planning topics from leading practitioners in this area.
  • Invaluable practice documents including tables, charts and lists.
  • Plain-English guidance from world-class experts.
  • Real-world and in-depth analysis that lets you explore various options.
  • Time-saving access to relevant sections of tax laws, regulations, court cases, IRS documents and more.
  • Alternative approaches to both common and unique tax scenarios.

This Portfolio is part of the Premier State Tax Library, a comprehensive series, which covers major state tax transactions and issues with expert, in-depth analysis, and offers commentary on a wide range of multi-state and state-specific taxation topics, including Sales and Use, Corporate Income, Individual Income, Property, Gross Receipts, Limitations on States' Authorities to Tax, Credits and Incentives, Electronic Commerce, Mergers and Acquisitions, Procedure and Administration, Special Industries, and more.

 

Detailed Analysis

1690.01. INTRODUCTION

1690.02. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES

Introductory Material

A. Chemical Waste Management and Fort Gratiot

B. Previous Commerce Clause Holdings

C. Options for the States

1690.03. FEDERAL TAX TREATMENT

Introductory Material

A. Qualified Environmental Remediation Expenditures

B. Other Environmental Clean–Up Expenditures

1690.04. PROPERTY TAX CONSEQUENCES

Introductory Material

A. Causes of Market Value Loss

B. Unmarketability of Contaminated Property

C. Valuation Techniques

D. Conclusion

1690.05. HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES AND TAXES

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Alabama

2. Arizona

3. California

a. Overview: Agencies Regulating Hazardous Substances

b. Defining “Hazardous Waste”

(1) Hazardous Waste

(2) Extremely Hazardous Waste

(3) Acutely Hazardous Waste

(4) Waste

c. Hazardous Waste Facility Fee

(1) Procedure for Payment

(2) Subject Facilities

(a) Permit Not Required

(b) Facilities With Variances

(c) Remedial Activities

(d) Facilities in Closure

(e) Section 25205.3 Exemptions

(f) Conditional Exemptions

(g) Standardized Permits

(h) Cleaning Underground Storage Tanks

(i) Removing Air Pollutants

(3) Classification of Facilities

(a) Type of Facility

(b) Size of Facility

(4) Rate Schedules

(a) Based on Type and Size

(b) Facilities With Post–Closure Permits

(c) Facilities With Standardized Permits

(d) Government Agency Operators

d. Hazardous Waste Disposal Fee

(1) Procedure for Payment

(2) Liability and Exemptions

(a) Government Agency

(b) Residential Use

(c) Certain Treatment Facilities

(d) Non Hazardous Mining Waste

(e) Certain Activities by Public Agencies

(3) Calculating the Fee

(a) Weight

(b) Form of Hazardous Waste

(c) Rates

e. Hazardous Waste Generator Fee

(1) Procedure for Payment

(2) Liability

(a) “Generator” Defined

(b) “Hazardous Waste” Defined

(3) Rate Schedule

(4) Exemptions

(a) Imported Hazardous Waste

(b) Recycled Hazardous Materials

(c) Aqueous Waste

(d) Victims of Disaster

(e) Used Motor Oil

(f) Removal by a Government Agency

(g) Single Family Residence

(5) Hazardous Waste Generator Fee Surcharge

(a) Procedure for Payment

(b) Rate Schedule

(c) Exemptions

f. Environmental Fee

(1) Liability

(2) Fee Schedule

g. Hazardous Substance Account Fees

(1) Scope

(2) Liability

(a) “Potentially Responsible Party”

(b) “Person”

(3) Fee Amount

(4) Procedure for Payment

h. Miscellaneous Fees

(1) Hazardous Waste Manifest Fee

(2) Generator Identification Number Verification Fee

(3) Waste Classification Fee

(4) Permit Activity Fees

(5) Facilities with Standardized Permits

(6) Hazardous Waste Border Zone Property Fee

(7) Fee Imposed on Hazardous Electronic Waste

4. Colorado

5. Connecticut

6. Florida

7. Georgia

a. Hazardous Waste Management Fees

b. Waste Water Fee

c. Hazardous Substance Reporting Fee

8. Idaho

9. Illinois

10. Indiana

11. Kansas

12. Kentucky

a. Facility Fee

b. Review Fee

c. Assessment Fee

d. Modification Fee

13. Louisiana

14. Maine

15. Maryland

a. Permit Fees

b. Community Right-to-Know Fee

16. Minnesota

17. Mississippi

18. Missouri

19. New Jersey

20. Ohio

21. Oklahoma

22. Oregon

23. Pennsylvania

24. South Carolina

25. South Dakota

26. Tennessee

27. Texas

a. Generation Fee

b. Facility Fee

c. Management Fee

28. West Virginia

a. Facility Fee

b. Supplemental Fee

29. Wisconsin

a. Facility Fee

b. Generator Fee

c. Other Fees

1690.06. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS TAXES

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Arkansas

2. California

a. Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fee

b. Uniform Oil Spill Response Fee

3. Florida

a. Coastal Protection

b. Water Quality

c. Inland Protection

4. Georgia

5. Hawaii

6. Idaho

7. Illinois

8. Kansas

9. Kentucky

10. Louisiana

a. Production Wells

b. Special Fuels Tax

c. Oil Spill Tax

11. Michigan

12. Mississippi

13. Oklahoma

14. Oregon

15. Rhode Island

16. South Carolina

17. Tennessee

18. Texas

19. Washington

a. Petroleum Products

b. Oil Spill Taxes

1690.07. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TAX

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Alabama

2. Alaska

3. Arizona

4. Indiana

5. Illinois

6. Louisiana

7. Maryland

8. Massachusetts

9. Michigan

10. Mississippi

11. New Jersey

12. New Mexico

13. Pennsylvania

14. Texas

15. Utah

1690.08. NUCLEAR FACILITY AND WASTE FEES

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Arkansas

2. Florida

3. Illinois

a. Facility Fees

b. Waste Fees

4. Kansas

5. Louisiana

6. Mississippi

7. Pennsylvania

8. Texas

9. Utah

a Fee on Radioactive Waste

b. Fee for Perpetual Care and Maintenance of Facility

c. Tax on Radioactive Waste

d. Generator Site Access Permits

10. Wisconsin

1690.09. SEWERAGE TAX

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Arizona

2. Colorado

3. Florida

4. Mississippi

5. Missouri

6. Texas

1690.10. SOLID WASTE FEES

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. District of Columbia

2. Georgia

3. Kansas

a. Collection and Disposal Fee

b. Permit Fee

c. Tonnage Fee

d. Charge for Waste Generated Outside the County

4. Kentucky

5. Minnesota

6. New Jersey

a. Closure Tax

b. Solid Waste Services Tax

c. Resource Recovery Investment Tax

d. Siting Tax

e. Solid Waste Importation Tax

f. Solid Waste Generation Recycling Tax

7. Pennsylvania

a. Disposal Fee for Municipal Waste Landfills

b. Recycling Fee for Municipal Waste Landfills and Resource Recovery Facilities

c. Environmental Stewardship Fee

1690.11. LITTER TAX

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Florida

2. Hawaii

3. Nebraska

4. New Jersey

5. Ohio

6. Rhode Island

7. Tennessee

8. Virginia

9. Washington

1690.12. VEHICLE TIRE TAX

A. Introduction

B. State–by–State Analysis

1. Alabama

2. Alaska

3. Arizona

4. Arkansas

5. California

6. Colorado

7. Connecticut

8. District of Columbia

9. Florida

10. Georgia

11. Hawaii

12. Illinois

13. Indiana

14. Kansas

15. Kentucky

16. Louisiana

17. Maine

18. Maryland

19. Michigan

20. Mississippi

21. Missouri

22. Nebraska

23. Nevada

24. New York

25. North Carolina

26. Ohio

27. Oklahoma

28. Oregon

29. Pennsylvania

30. Rhode Island

31. South Carolina

32. Tennessee

33. Texas

34. Utah

35. Virginia

36. Washington

Working Papers

Item Description Sheet

Worksheet 1 CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HUNT, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, et al.

Opinion

Worksheet 2 FORT GRATIOT SANITARY LANDFILL, INC. v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Opinion

Worksheet 3 Sec. 198. Expensing Of Environmental Remediation Costs

Worksheet 4 Rev. Rul. 98-25, 1998-19 I.R.B. 4 (5/11/98)

Worksheet 5 Rev. Proc. 98-47

Worksheet 6 Rev. Rul. 94-38, 1994-1 C.B. 35

Worksheet 7 Technical Advice Memorandum 9627002

Worksheet 8 Rev. Rul. 2004-18, 2004-8 I.R.B. 509 (2/23/2004)

Bibliography

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Edwin Antolin
Edwin P. Antolin is a senior associate in the Tax Department in Morrison & Foerster's San Francisco office. Mr. Antolin's practice focuses on the resolution of state and local tax controversies and advising clients on the state and local tax ramifications of various business transactions. He has represented individuals as well as multistate and multinational businesses in state and local tax cases before all levels of administrative review in California and before trial and appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court. He received his B.A. degree in finance from the University of Washington in 1986, and his J.D. degree from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, in 1994. While at Hastings, he was elected to the Thurston Honor Society, and he served on the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, and as a Note Editor on the Hastings International and Comparative Law Review.
C. James Judson
Charles Moll, III
Charles Moll, III, A.B. degree from Cornell University in 1976, J.D. from George Washington University in 1979. He served as an Attorney Advisor to Chief Judge C. Moxley Featherston of the United States Tax Court from 1979 through 1981. Thereafter, he joined the Tax Department of Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco and became a partner of the firm on January 1, 1989.  Mr. Moll's practice primarily involves the resolution of tax controversies through litigation and negotiation. He practices extensively in state and local tax matters before all levels of California's courts, taxing authorities, and a wide variety of county assessment appeals boards. His practice also covers federal tax matters, including the representation of clients in federal courts and at appellate hearings before the Internal Revenue Service.   Mr. Moll has lectured and written on a variety of federal and state tax issues, including teaching in the Golden Gate University graduate tax program and speaking at the Southern California Annual Tax Institute.