Unclaimed Property traces the history and evolution of unclaimed property law and brings today's laws into sharper focus by providing a comprehensive overview of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform Laws' (NCCUSL) Uniform Unclaimed Property Acts. Written by Kendall L. Houghton, Esq., Baker & McKenzie LLP, and John L. Coalson, Esq., Alston & Bird LLP, this Portfolio explains the origin of unclaimed property concepts, conducts an in-depth discussion of features of the acts and the constitutional aspects of the acts and their enforcement, and outlines various audit and compliance issues.
State unclaimed property laws are a patchwork of non-uniform requirements that have increasingly become a trap for the unwary. As states continue to aggressively pursue unclaimed property, by such measures as delegating collection authority to contingent fee auditors, an understanding of unclaimed property law becomes more important. This Portfolio provides an in-depth discussion of the features of the 1954, 1966, 1981, and 1995 NCCUSL Acts, highlighting the unique legal issues created by each version and explaining the problems addressed by each act.
This Portfolio also addresses requirements imposed on specific industries and the rules governing priority when more than one state has a claim. In addition, it addresses the availability of important constitutional protections to thwart an unwarranted “fishing expedition” by a state or private auditor. Other issues such as compliance, internal accounting statutes of limitations, and audit considerations are discussed as well.
Finally, Unclaimed Property provides an overview of the organizations representing unclaimed property administrators and unclaimed property holders and contains reprints of the NCCUSL Acts, reprints of some important U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and charts that provide state-specific information.
Unclaimed Property allows you to benefit from:
This Portfolio is part of the Premier State Tax Library, a comprehensive series, which covers major state tax transactions and issues with expert, in-depth analysis, and offers commentary on a wide range of multi-state and state-specific taxation topics, including Sales and Use, Corporate Income, Individual Income, Property, Gross Receipts, Limitations on States' Authorities to Tax, Credits and Incentives, Electronic Commerce, Mergers and Acquisitions, Procedure and Administration, Special Industries, and more.
Detailed Analysis
1600.01. INTRODUCTION
1600.02. HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF CURRENT UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAW
Introductory Material
A. Definitions Under Common Law
1. Escheat and Bona Vacantia
a. Escheat
b. Bona Vacantia
2. Abandoned Property
3. Mislaid and Lost Property
a. Mislaid Property
b. Lost Property
4. Treasure–Trove
5. Unclaimed Property
B. American Statutory Law
1. State Statutes
2. Constitutionality of Escheat Statutes, Generally
1600.03. THE UNIFORM ACTS
A. Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (1954)
1. Prefatory Note to the 1954 Uniform Act
B. Revised Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (1966)
C. Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1981)
D. Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995)
1600.04. FEATURES OF THE UNIFORM ACTS
A. Property Subject to Custody
1. Property Enumerated in the Uniform Acts
2. Non–Specified Property Alleged To Be Subject To State Unclaimed Property Acts
3. Property Removed From The Scope Of Uniform Acts By State Law
a. In General
b. Specific States
(1) Idaho
(2) Iowa
(3) Maryland
(4) North Carolina
(5) North Dakota
(6) Ohio
(7) Oregon
(8) Rhode Island
(9) Virginia
B. Periods for Presumption of Abandonment
C. Special Provisions for Certain Holders
1. Financial Institutions
a. Travelers Checks, Money Orders, etc.
b. Checks, Drafts and Similar Instruments Issued or Certified by Banking and Financial Organizations
c. Bank Deposits and Funds in Financial Institutions
2. Insurance Companies
a. Funds Held by Insurers
b. Unclaimed Proceeds Resulting from an Insurer's Demutualization
c. State Dormancy Periods for Unclaimed Demutualized Funds
(1) Arkansas
(2) California
(3) Florida
(4) Indiana
(5) Iowa
(6) Kansas
(7) Kentucky
(8) Maine
(9) Massachusetts
(10) Michigan
(11) Missouri
(12) Nebraska
(13) New Hampshire
(14) New Jersey
(15) New York
(16) Rhode Island
(17) South Carolina
(18) Tennessee
(19) Virginia
(20) Vermont
(21) Wisconsin
3. Utilities
4. Business Associations
a. Refunds
b. Stock and Other Intangible Interests in Business Associations
c. Property of Business Associations Held in Course of Dissolution
5. Agents and Fiduciaries
6. Retailers and Manufacturers
D. Rules Governing Priority of State Claims
1. Priority Rules
a. Texas v. New Jersey
b. Interpretation and Application of Texas v. New Jersey
c. Special Priority Rules
2. An Unclaimed Property “Throwback” Rule: The Third Priority Claim
a. Introduction
b. Effect of Federal Common Law Priority Scheme
(1) Federal Common Law Governing State Unclaimed Property Jurisdiction
(2) Texas v. New Jersey
(3) Pennsylvania v. New York
(4) Delaware v. New York
c. State Court Decisions Adopting Different Priority Schemes
(1) Texas: Liquidating Trustees
(2) New Jersey: Chubb Corp. and Elsinore Shore Associates
(3) District of Columbia: Riggs National Bank
(4) Oklahoma: TXO Production Co.
d. Analysis of the Relative Strength of the Positions Regarding the Transactional Priority Rule
3. “Good Faith” Defense When Reporting Unclaimed Property to the Holder's Domicile State
1600.05. CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ACTS AND THEIR ENFORCEMENT
A. Nexus: Jurisdiction of a State to Enforce Its Unclaimed Property Statute
B. Holder Record Audits (Fishing Expeditions)
1. 1954 and 1966 Uniform Acts – Reason to Believe
2. 1981 and 1995 Uniform Acts–Elimination of Reason to Believe Standard
3. Nonetheless, the Examination Must be Reasonable
4. The Fourth Amendment – Administrative Examinations Should be Conducted Pursuant to a Search Warrant or Functional Equivalent
5. Application of the Examination Standards to Holders
6. Due Process Jurisdictional Defense Against “Fishing Expeditions”
C. Contingent Fee Audits
1. Introduction
2. Due Process Requirements
3. Cases Involving Challenges to the Multistate Tax Commission's Multistate Audit Program
4. State Court Decisions Addressing the Public Policy Implications of Third Party Tax Audits
5. Other State Court Cases Involving Third Party Tax Audits and Public Policy
6. Factors Bearing Upon the Public Policy and Due Process Implications of Third Party Contract Audits
a. Is the contract audit firm compensated in whole or in part on a contingent fee?
b. Does the contract audit firm have discretion to select (or “recommend”) targets for audit?
c. Does the “audit” involve examination of confidential books and business records, or merely review of returns or other publicly filed information and advice to governmental authorities in interpreting and evaluating such records?
d. Is information received by the contingent fee auditors specifically made confidential by statute or agreement, and does the confidentiality extend to prohibit use by the auditor for its own purposes?
e. Does the audit firm work exclusively for governments or does it “play both sides of the fence”?
f. Does the audit firm have the authority to conduct audits simultaneously on behalf of multiple jurisdictions?
D. Federal Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption
1. ERISA Benefit Plans
2. Bankruptcy
3. Federal Banking Laws
a. Custodial Taking of Unclaimed Accounts
b. Service Charges
4. Miscellaneous Laws
1600.06. OTHER ISSUES
A. Compliance
1. Reporting
2. Payment or Delivery of Abandoned Property
B. Internal Accounting, Auditing and Tracking Unclaimed Property
C. Statute of Limitations
1. Derivative Rights Doctrine Versus Anti–Limitations Provisions
2. Contractual Periods of Limitation: Expiration Dates
3. Limitations Period for State Enforcement Actions
1600.07. AUDIT ISSUES
A. Multijurisdictional Audits
1. Authority for Such Audits
2. SNAP or Bounty Hunters
3. Likelihood of Multistate Audit
B. Issues Raised When State Retains Outside Consultants as Auditors
1. Confidentiality
2. Compensation
C. Handling an Audit Request (Single–State or Multistate)
D. Retention of Records
E. Estimates and Statistical Sampling
F. Amnesty Programs
1600.08. ORGANIZATIONS REPRESENTING UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ADMINISTRATORS AND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY HOLDERS
A. National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators [NAUPA]
B. National Association of State Treasurers [NAST]
C. Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization [UPPO]
D. Council On State Taxation [COST]
E. Consultants for Holders
1600.09. STATE–BY–STATE SUMMARY
A. In General
B. Specific States
1. Alabama
2. Alaska
3. Arizona
4. Arkansas
5. California
6. Colorado
7. Connecticut
8. Delaware
9. District of Columbia
10. Florida
11. Georgia
12. Hawaii
13. Idaho
14. Illinois
15. Indiana
16. Iowa
17. Kansas
18. Kentucky
19. Louisiana
20. Maine
21. Maryland
22. Massachusetts
23. Michigan
24. Minnesota
25. Mississippi
26. Missouri
27. Montana
28. Nebraska
29. Nevada
30. New Hampshire
31. New Jersey
32. New Mexico
33. New York
34. North Carolina
35. North Dakota
36. Ohio
37. Oklahoma
38. Oregon
39. Pennsylvania
40. Rhode Island
41. South Carolina
42. South Dakota
43. Tennessee
44. Texas
45. Utah
46. Vermont
47. Virginia
48. Washington
49. West Virginia
50. Wisconsin
51. Wyoming
Working Papers
Item Description Sheet
Worksheet 1 Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (1954)
Worksheet 2 Revised Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (1966)
Worksheet 3 Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1981)
Worksheet 4 Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995)
Worksheet 5 U.S. Supreme Court DELAWARE v. NEW YORK, 507 U.S. 490 (1993)
Opinion
Worksheet 6 U.S. Supreme Court PENNSYLVANIA v. NEW YORK, 407 U.S. 206 (1972)
Worksheet 7 U.S. Supreme Court TEXAS v. NEW JERSEY, 379 U.S. 674 (1965)
Worksheet 8 State Unclaimed Property Offices
Worksheet 9 Unclaimed Property Filing Dates
Worksheet 10 State Unclaimed Wages Laws - Comparison Chart
Worksheet 11 Shut-Down of California's Unclaimed Property Program Should Be Warning to Other States, COST Report Says An Interview with Jana Leslie Malone
Bibliography