Securities Law Daily provides daily coverage of developments in the regulation of federal, state, and international securities and futures trading, with objective coverage of the...
Nov. 1 — Apple Inc. can't omit from its 2017 proxy materials shareholder proposals that it amend its proxy-access bylaws and hire experts to reform its executive-compensation practices, the SEC staff said ( Apple, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter, 10/26/16; Apple, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter, 10/27/16).
The Division of Corporation Finance said it couldn't agree that the executive-compensation proposal is unduly vague or that it relates to an ordinary business matter. The proxy access proposal can't be omitted as substantially implemented, the division said.
In the 2016 proxy season, companies asked the SEC staff for relief from proxy-access proposals more than any other shareholder resolution. The staff allowed most such proposals to be omitted based on 1934 Securities Exchange Act Rule 14a-8(i)(10), which allows companies to omit shareholder proposals that have been substantially implemented. However, late in the proxy season, the staff disagreed that H&R Block Inc. could exclude a proxy access proposal from shareholder activist James McRitchie and Myra Young as substantially implemented.
In this case, McRitchie asked Apple to include a proposal that would:
In a letter signed by Associate General Counsel Gene D. Levoff, Apple asked to omit the proposal as “substantially implemented” even though its proxy access bylaw doesn't “exactly match” the proposal.
The SEC staff didn't agree. In a letter signed by Special Counsel Evan S. Jacobson, it said it couldn't concur “that Apple's proxy access bylaw compares favorably with the guidelines of the proposal.”
The SEC staff consistently has denied no-action relief to companies where the proponent asks for modifications to proxy access bylaws and where the companies have made no such modifications, McRitchie told Bloomberg BNA in an e-mail Nov. 1. “Apple is no exception.”
In his view, the staff's move “means that companies with proxy access ‘lite’ can continue to expect proposals to bring their bylaws into better alignment with best practices as outlined by the Council of Institutional Investors.”
"Proxy access at Apple is largely illusionary, since those most likely to use it cannot do so with a nominee group limitation of 20,” McRitchie said.
“Even if shareholders successfully used proxy access at Apple, they would be only able to elect one director under the current bylaws,” he said. “One director would likely have little impact, since it is unlikely they would even get a second on significant motions before the Board.”
In the executive compensation proposal, Apple shareholder Jing Zhao asked Apple to include a proposal that the company “engage multiple outside independent experts” in order to reform its executive-compensation practices. Apple argued that the proposal could be omitted under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) as dealing with hiring decisions—a matter of ordinary business.
The SEC staff didn't agree. In a letter signed by Jacobson, it said the proposal “focuses on senior executive compensation” and can't be excluded under the rule.
Activists have been using shareholder proposals to show their disfavor with soaring pay in corporate America. The SEC staff this year has rejected requests by several companies for assurance they could omit compensation-related shareholder resolutions from their proxy materials.
To contact the reporter on this story: Phyllis Diamond at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Seth Stern at firstname.lastname@example.org
To see the executive compensation no-action correspondence, go to http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/SEC_NoAction_Letter_Apple_Inc_2016_BL_360609.
To see the no-action correspondence on proxy access, go to http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/SEC_NoAction_Letter_Apple_Inc_2016_BL_364327
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)