+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Yoomi Lee | Bloomberg Law SEC v. Hicks, No. 11-CV-11888 (D. Mass. filed Oct. 26, 2011); SEC Press Release No. PR-2011-225 (Oct. 26, 2011) The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained an asset freeze against Andrey C. Hicks and his purported quantitative hedge fund, Locust Offshore Management, LLC (LOM and together, Defendants) in connection with the fraudulent offer and sale of shares in a sham British Virgin Islands (BVI) incorporated pooled investment fund, Locust Offshore Fund, Ltd (Locust Fund). LOM is purported to be the sole manager of the Locust Fund. The SEC charges Defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions against Defendants, disgorgement, and payment of civil monetary penalties. Additionally, the SEC seeks disgorgement from the Locust Fund, which is named as a relief defendant.
False and Misleading StatementsThe SEC alleges that Defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme by creating the false and deceptive appearance that the Locust Fund was a legitimately operating BVI incorporated pooled investment fund, when it never actually existed. To create the false impression that the Locust Fund was legitimate, Defendants allegedly created a website and professional materials, including stationary, business cards, and email signature blocks. LOM's website displayed investment information such as the current balance of the Locust Fund, total subscriptions, and year to date returns. Defendants also opened business checking and savings accounts in LOM's name to further create the appearance of legitimacy. As the result of their scheme, Defendants purportedly defrauded investors and misappropriated approximately $1.8 million. Defendants also allegedly created a Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM) for the offer and sale of shares in the Locust Fund. The SEC charges that Defendants made numerous materially false and misleading statements regarding (1) the existence of the Locust Fund as a BVI incorporated company; (2) the existence of a purported professional auditor, prime broker, and custodian for the Locust Fund; and (3) Hicks' education and professional background. For example, there is no record of any business company named "Locust Offshore Fund" according to a records search by the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission. Moreover, although the CIM claimed that Ernst and Young LLP and Credit Suisse Group served as the Locust Fund's auditor and prime broker, respectively, no such records exist. The CIM also stated that Hicks was employed at Barclays Capital where he traded securities across several different asset classes and doubled his group's assets under management to roughly $16 billion in a little over a year. Barclays, however, does not have a record of Hicks' ever being employed there according to the SEC. Finally, the SEC alleges that Hicks was forced to withdraw from Harvard University for failing to perform academically, despite his claims that he is a Harvard graduate and that LOM's quantitative strategies are based on the mathematical models developed by him during his tenure at the university. Accordingly, the SEC charges that Defendants knowingly or recklessly misled investors. DisclaimerThis document and any discussions set forth herein are for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice, which has to be addressed to particular facts and circumstances involved in any given situation. Review or use of the document and any discussions does not create an attorney-client relationship with the author or publisher. To the extent that this document may contain suggested provisions, they will require modification to suit a particular transaction, jurisdiction or situation. Please consult with an attorney with the appropriate level of experience if you have any questions. Any tax information contained in the document or discussions is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code. Any opinions expressed are those of the author. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and its affiliated entities do not take responsibility for the content in this document or discussions and do not make any representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy.©2014 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All rights reserved. Bloomberg Law Reports ® is a registered trademark and service mark of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).