Bloomberg BNA's Pension & Benefits Blog is a special resource offered by Bloomberg BNA to provide commentary and insight on news and trends reported in our publications: Pension & Benefits Daily, Pension & Benefits Reporter, and the Benefits Practice Resource Center. The authors of the blog are members of our Benefits Practice Resource Advisory Board and members of staff (who contribute summaries of some of their recent stories).
The ideas presented here are those of individuals, and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members. We reserve the right not to post comments that are abusive or otherwise objectionable.
Communications regarding the Pension & Benefits Blog may be directed to Dana Domone via e-mail to email@example.com.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Retirement benefits are front and center on the policy agendas of employee
benefit groups as Congress and President Obama negotiate a deal to solve the
nation's fiscal crisis during the final weeks of 2012.
The American Benefits Council said it was asking Congress during the
legislature's present lame-duck session to consider a six-point policy agenda that ABC said
would help employers maintain their defined benefit plans and promote job
creation and retirement security.
ABC said enactment of the provisions in its agenda would generate billions of
dollars in tax revenue by making permanent changes in statutory interest rates
used to calculate the minimum amounts that defined benefit plan sponsors must
contribute to their employees' tax-deferred pension trust funds.
The six-point agenda called for the interest rate corridor that applies in
2012 under temporary pension funding stabilization rules in the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. No. 112-141) to become
Another employee benefit group, the ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC), said it
has a less-detailed policy agenda for the lame-duck session.
“This lame duck is scarier than most because of everything that is at stake,”
Kathryn Ricard, ERIC's senior vice president for retirement policy, said Dec. 5
in an interview with BNA.
to post a comment.
A Possible Alternative to the Moench-ies (Part II)
Attorneys Make Predictions on Fee Litigation, Questions of Constitutional Standing
Battle Over Presumption of Prudence Heats Up Ahead of High Court Arguments
IRS Windsor Retroactivity Guidance Leaves Questions on ERISA Claims, Practitioners Say
Retirement Plans Aren't Required to Apply Windsor Ruling Retroactively, IRS Says