Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
Sept. 28 — A black building services foreman at Northern Illinois University who found a hangman’s noose in his work area doesn’t have a triable claim for a racially hostile work environment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled ( Cole v. Bd. of Trs. of N. Ill. Univ. , 7th Cir., No. 15-2305, 9/27/16 ).
Jerome Cole alleged that he was generally mistreated since he was promoted and became the only black foreman in 2009. He said he didn’t have the same privileges as other foremen and that supervisors falsely accused him of things like unauthorized possession of keys. The court dismissed most of these allegations for various reasons and only considered the noose incident.
When Cole reported the noose, a supervisor became upset, asked him why he didn’t get rid of it and “appeared to blame him for finding the noose at all,” Judge David Hamilton wrote in the Sept. 27 decision. A co-worker admitted during an investigation that “nooses had been found in the work area for years,” the judge said.
After speaking with friends who are police officers, Cole took their advice and maintained “a nonchalant facade in the hope of leading the perpetrator to identify himself,” Hamilton said. The detective assigned to look into the incident was later told to stop his investigation “for reasons he did not know,” the court said. The noose disappeared around the same time. The perpetrator was never identified.
An employee who accuses co-workers of bias must show the employer was negligent in discovering or remedying the harassment. In Cole’s case, his supervisor’s decision to give her notes about the noose incident to university police and inform the vice president of public safety and community relations was reasonable, the court said.
Despite its ruling, the court noted that reporting to a third party may not be enough in “perhaps many cases” and that employers could be liable even if a victim “feigns unconcern” about an incident. It based its ruling here on the specific distinguishing characteristics of Cole’s situation—“an incident that lacked any other threatening overtones and that Cole himself characterized as a joke by” a former co-worker.
“The court really decided the case based on these very specific and particular sets of facts, and I’m glad about that,” Rae Vann, general counsel of the Equal Employment Advisory Counsel, an employers' association in Washington, told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 28.
“I don’t think anyone would be wise to take this decision as any indication that they can just sit back once a third party is involved in this sort of thing,” Vann, who was not involved in the case, said.
“If I were advising an HR person on this, I would expect there to be more action taken proactively to prevent recurrence, and to further educate and retrain employees, especially if there’s suspicion that the perpetrator was an employee and not an outsider,” she said.
Vann said she was a bit perplexed by the facts of the case, despite the court holding that a feigned lack of concern doesn’t mean the employer has no responsibility to remedy workplace discrimination.
“I’m not sure that the university could have pursued any other avenues the police hadn’t, or wouldn’t—which isn’t to say that that’s best practice,” Vann said. “An employer in this situation could and should have pursued the investigation all the way through.
The court said it wasn't laying down “firm rules” for when a noose in the workplace is or isn't severe enough to be actionable under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act or other federal bias laws. Vann said she was “troubled” by this.
“The most remarkable thing for me about the case, was what seemed to be equivocation on the impact of a noose in the workplace,” Vann said. “At one point, they mention a noose’s status as a visceral symbol of the death of thousands of African Americans, but then they seem to waffle. It’s unquestionable that the appearance of a noose in the workplace is offensive and stands for something entirely and directly contrary to a harassment-free work environment.”
Fabian John Rosati in Chicago represented Cole. The attorney general’s office represented the university and its officials.
To contact the reporter on this story: Hassan A. Kanu in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Cole_v_Bd_of_Trs_of_N_Ill_Univ_No_152305_2016_BL_318186_7th_Cir_S.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)