The Bloomberg BNA International Tax Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues. The ideas presented here are those of individuals, and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Elvin Hedgpeth, who was with the U.S. Competent Authority office for more than 28 years before joining Ernst & Young, and Arjo van Eijsden, head of the firm's Dutch tax litigation group, describe how tax officials' recent pronouncements indicate that they likely will participate in simultaneous and joint audits to get a bird's-eye view of a multinational enterprise's global tax position.
While Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States are known to have engaged in simultaneous exams in the past, they note that the volume of such examinations over recent years has shown little increase despite the rapid pace of globalization.
However, they conclude that this is about to change and that corporations should be expecting more multi-authority examinations. To read the Nov. 9 article in BNA's Daily Tax Report, visit http://www.bna.com/products/corplaw/dtr.htm
To view the European Commission's "Proposal for a Council Directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation" see: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0029:FIN:EN:PDF
To view the Internal Revenue Service language on simultaneous audits see Internal Revenue Manual - 4.46.3 Planning the Examination at: http://www.transferpricing.com/pdf/Internal%20Revenue%20Manual%20-%204.46.3%20Planning%20the%20Examination%20(Cont.%202).pdf
— Rita McWilliams, Managing Editor, BNA Tax Management's Transfer Pricing Report
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Routine Transfer Pricing Is Not Tax Evasion, Company Executives Say
D.C. Transfer Pricing Challenge Moves Toward Trial
Uncertainty in the Financial Services Area
Chinese Official Speaks to Human Cost of Location Savings