On April 12 the California Supreme Court filed its long-awaited opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Court. On the headline "provide v. ensure" issue, the Court adopted the position advocated by Brinker that an employer must provide its non-exempt employees an uninterrupted 30-minute meal period, but does not need to ensure that the employees take them.
On the related issue of meal period timing, the Court rejected the plaintiffs' "rolling five" argument that employees must be provided a meal period after each consecutive five hours of work and held instead there are no meal period timing requirements beyond an employer's obligation to provide a meal period after no more than five hours of work, a second meal period after no more than ten hours of work, and so on.
The Court also addressed several compliance and timing issues regarding rest periods, and on the all-important question of whether meal and rest break claims can be litigated class-wide, the Court addressed a number of critically important issues that will guide future trial courts in deciding whether to certify wage and hour lawsuits as class actions or not.
So what must a California employer now do to comply with California's meal and rest break laws? This program will focus on the nuts and bolts of meal and rest break compliance in light of Brinker and how to successfully navigate this technically dense area of the law. It will also address Brinker's implications for the future of wage and hour class actions in California - both those already pending and those still-to-be-filed - and also for the handful of cases that have been on hold at the Supreme Court pending the disposition of Brinker. In particular:
Register quickly and easily online to secure your space now. Or, please call 1-800-372-1033 option 6, then sub-menu option 1, and refer to date and title of conference. Lines are open Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. ET, excluding most federal holidays.
Don't miss this opportunity to hear a lively, dynamic presentation. Not only are Webinars an excellent way for you to stay current; with Bloomberg BNA you also get:
In addition, you'll receive:
Bloomberg BNA is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.learningmarket.org
Prerequisite: No prerequisites requiredLevel: Basic
Delivery Method: Group-Internet
Advanced Preparation: None requiredRecommended CPE Credit: 1.5
Recordings of the program do not qualify for CPE credits. For more information regarding administrative policies such as complaint and refund, please contact our offices at 800-372-1033.
Karen Kubin, Partner, Morrison & Foerster; Neil D. Perry, Associate, Morrison & Foerster
Karen Kubin, Partner, Morrison & Foerster, represented Brinker International in Brinker v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum) and regularly defends employers in class actions and other complex employment litigation alleging wage and hour violations, discrimination, harassment, wrongful discharge, trade secret theft, ERISA violations, and retaliation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other whistleblower laws. Ms. Kubin has broad jury and bench trial experience in both federal and state courts; she is also experienced in domestic and international arbitrations. Her client list spans an array of industries, including the communications, consumer products, energy, entertainment, financial services, life sciences, publishing, restaurant, retail, technology, transportation, and venture capital sectors. Ms. Kubin was named by the Daily Journal as one of California's Top Women Litigators (2007-2008), one of California's Top 100 Lawyers (2009), and one of California's Top Employment Lawyers (2010-2011). Chambers USA recommended Ms. Kubin in 2009, 2010, and again in 2011, for her expertise in employment law, calling her a "strategic and aggressive litigator who provides first-class advice."
Neil D. Perry, Associate, Morrison & Foerster, is a litigation associate at Morrison & Foerster, where he is a member of the firm's Employment and Labor Group. Mr. Perry's practice encompasses all areas of employment law, including the defense of class and single-plaintiff wage and hour, discrimination, and harassment actions, and advising management on employment policies and procedures. He earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of California, Hastings College of Law, where he was co-chair of the Hastings Moot Court Board and a member of the Thurston Society. While attending law school, he served as an extern to Associate Justice Carlos R. Moreno of the California Supreme Court. Prior to joining Morrison & Foerster, Mr. Perry worked as a computer programmer and IT project manager for several companies, including Macromedia and Paramount Pictures.