The Bloomberg BNA Federal Tax Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues about federal tax topics. The ideas presented here are those of individuals and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Two bills passed by the California legislature and signed by the governor set the stage for the first state-sponsored retirement program for employees of private employers. If the program moves forward, companies that have five or more employees and do not offer their own retirement plan would be required to deduct 3% of participating employees' wages and deposit the funds into government-run investment accounts. Employees would be automatically enrolled in the program, unless they opt out of participating.
It is far from clear that the program described in the bills would meet tax qualification requirements and other standards set under ERISA. A governing board established under the legislation plans to ask the Internal Revenue Service and the Labor Department whether the program would qualify for federal pre-tax treatment and ERISA preemption.
If the program survives these legal challenges, it will certainly increase access to employer-sponsored retirement plans for Californians. But it also will add to administrative burdens on employers by compelling companies to institute new payroll deductions. On the other hand, the program would transfer the burden of running a retirement savings plan to the state. What will be the net effect on employers?
Tax Law Editor (Compensation Planning)
to post a comment.
An ERISA Claim Walks Into a Bar...: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life
No Individual Mandate Penalty Arises from Extended Exchange Open Enrollment for 2014
Small Employers Shop the SHOP Exchange
Medical Conditions Are Not a Bar to Health Insurance Coverage Under the Affordable Care Act
Supreme Court Agrees to Review Birth Control Mandate Cases