Does sharing a computer password count as “authorization” to use the computer? A defendant is seeking clarification from a federal appeals court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a controversial opinion last month, attempted to define the term “without authorization” under a federal computer fraud law.
The court held in United States v. Nosal (“Nosal II”) that defendant David Nosal violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by using a past colleague's password to access a former employer's computers after his own access was terminated. Nosal asked Aug. 18 for a full appellate court rehearing.
The scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) has been widely debated, particularly because the law was originally designed to criminalize computer hacking. In the first ruling in this case (“Nosal I”), the Ninth Circuit held that Nosal’s colleagues didn’t exceed authorized access under the statute by violating company use restrictions.
Now, critics argue that Nosal II creates confusion over whether the law would criminalize password sharing.
The CFAA is “one of the most important statutes in the federal criminal code, but no one knows what it means,” Nosal argued in his petition. He asked for at least “minimal guidance” on what conduct is illegal under the law.
Nosal proposed that the court develop a multi-factor test to determine whether password sharing is allowed in a given situation. An amicus brief filed by the BSA | The Software Alliance, a trade group of software manufacturers, suggests that the court consider factors such as whether the authorized computer user:
had a legitimate basis for permitting third-party access;
actually allowed the third-party access;
permitted the access for the benefit of the computer owner; and
acted within the scope of authorization granted by the computer owner.
Nosal said that if the court chooses to govern liability by a multi-factor test, it should articulate what those factors are.
“As a matter of fair warning, every other computer user in the world is entitled to know whether and when sharing access credentials is a federal crime or not,” Nosal said.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)