The recession and the
subsequent sluggish recovery changed the way companies approach reward programs,
particularly at high-performing firms, a professor said April 29 at the 2013 WorldatWork
Total Rewards Conference in
Philadelphia.
Organizations have an
increased focus on increasing compensation effectiveness, particularly after
economic fluctuations, placing greater emphasis on future rewards than
concentrating what worked best in the past, said Dow Scott, a human resources professor
at Loyola University in Chicago
A survey of 303 senior
rewards professionals conducted by Loyola University, WorldatWork and the
consulting firm Hay Group found that many top companies not interested in what
competitors were doing, said Thomas D. McMullen, Hay Group’s North American rewards
leader. Instead, there was interest in what other top companies had planned for
the next few years, said McMullen, who presented a workshop session with Scott.
Exceptionally
performing companies look to the future of rewards practices as a means of
growth, in part by measuring the return on investment of reward programs now in
effect, McMullen said. A small percentage of other companies measure the return
on investment of reward programs, probably because most regard rewards as a
cost rather than an investment, he added.
Other companies struggle
to balance their rewards programs with what they would like the programs to achieve,
McMullen said. For example, while a majority of organizations expressed
interest in balancing employee and organization reward concerns, few firms solicited
employees to see what they wanted in such programs, McMullen said.
“Once you understand
what employees value, you can readjust your programs,” McMullen said. “You can
see what employees value and move money into those programs.”
The survey also found
that larger companies focus more than smaller firms on enacting consistency in
reward practices. For example, 74 percent of companies centered on market-pricing
processes and 62 percent were concerned with long-term variable pay program
consistency.
By Laime Vaitkus