The Bloomberg BNA Intellectual Property Blog is the home of the "Do You Copy?" podcast and offers links to selected articles by the BNA IP team, which is accessible to both subscribers and non-subscribers as well as commentary and analysis exclusive to this blog.
Monday, April 30, 2012
by Anandashankar Mazumdar
Podcast (stream or download):
In episode 19 of the "Do You Copy?" podcast, Ananda chats with Tony about two patent issues.
The first is the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Kappos v. Hyatt, which rejects the Federal Circuit's position that someone who disputes the PTO's rejection of a patent application in federal district court may not introduce evidence or arguments before the district court that were not presented to the PTO during the patent prosecution.
The Supreme Court's earlier, ground-shaking decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, prompts yet another discussion. This time, Tony takes Ananda on a journey back to the enactment of the Patent Act of 1952 and how the revered Giles Rich created a problem for the patent system that Mayo attempted, with limited success, to resolve.
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Stakeholders hopeful open approach bodes well for Goodlatte's copyright reform efforts
Asian-American rock band's attempt to register 'The Slants' rejected under §2(a)
Goodlatte's second draft on anti-troll legislation drops, adapts provisions
Todd Hughes to Join Federal Circuit following Senate's 98-0 confirmation vote
FTC seeks comments on questions to ask patent assertion entities under 6(b) authority