+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Nov. 13 -- A former compliance official for a housing-construction-products manufacturer is not entitled to a jury trial on allegations he was fired in violation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's whistle-blower anti-retaliation provision, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia concluded Nov. 12 (Pruett v. BlueLinx Holdings Inc., N.D. Ga., No. 1:13-cv-02607-JOF, 11/13/13).
Senior Judge J. Owen Forrester concluded that the remedies available--reinstatement with double back pay and litigation costs--essentially are equitable in nature.
The court recounted that plaintiff Jeffrey Pruitt claimed he was fired from his job as compliance manager at BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) for reporting possible corporate misconduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission. His prayer for relief included a request for punitive damages and a demand for a jury trial; BlueLinx countered that neither is available under the Dodd-Frank provision.
Concurring, the court first said Pruitt acknowledged that punitive damages are not currently available; however, he urged that dismissal be without prejudice in the event the statute is interpreted differently in the future. Refusing the request, the court said that if the law or its interpretation changes while the case remains pending, Pruett can raise the issue at that time.
Since the statute is silent as to the availability of a jury trial, the court continued, the major consideration is whether the remedy sought is legal or equitable in nature. It said that while reinstatement and back pay generally are considered equitable remedies, the matter is complicated by Dodd-Frank's provision for doubled back pay.
Pruett argued that the doubling provision takes the matter out of the equitable arena and moves it to damages. BlueLinx rejoined that doubling back pay “is an automatic calculation unlike compensatory or punitive damages.”
Agreeing with the defendant, the court said automatic doubling “is a calculation that lacks the discretion generally associated with monetary damages awarded by a jury.” For these and other reasons, it concluded that Pruett is not entitled to a jury trial.
To see the decision, go to http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Pruett_v_BlueLinx_Holdings_Inc_Docket_No_113cv02607_ND_Ga_Aug_07_.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).