+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Is social media so pervasive in modern society that banning its use by a disfavored group is unconstitutional, even when there is a significant governmental interest in favor of the restriction?
Three courts have grappled with this question and split on whether Nebraska, Indiana, and Louisiana restrictions on sex offender access to social media violates the First Amendment. Federal district courts in Nebraska and Louisiana held the bans unconstitutional, while a federal judge upheld Indiana's law (Doe v. Nebraska, D. Neb., No. 4:09-cv-03266-RGK-CRZ, 10/17/12); (Doe v. Prosecutor, S.D. Ind., No. 1:12-cv-00062-TWP-MJD, 6/22/12); (Doe v. Jindal, 853 F. Supp. 2d 596 (M.D. La. 2012)).
State legislatures have passed the laws in hopes of ensuring that sex offenders do not use social media platforms to contact minors. The Indiana court noted the legislature believed social media had "effectively created a 'virtual playground' for sexual predators to lurk."
The Nebraska judge who struck down the state's law agreed that protecting children from online predators was a significant governmental interest. Nonetheless, he argued that the state should have "use[d] a scalpel rather than a blunderbuss" when crafting legislation and applied the ban only to those convicted of using online sites to prey upon children.
His criticism of the law also included his observation that the law was indifferent to when "the offender legitimately needs access to the banned sites to make his or her living" or when "the offender legitimately needs access to the banned sites to obtain news that probably cannot be obtained in another way."
The Indiana judge was not convinced that the increasing use of social media made the ban unconstitutional.
The judge said she "readily concedes that social networking is a prominent feature of modern-day society." However, "communication does not begin with a 'Facebook wall post' and end with a '140-character Tweet.' "
Despite the law, restricted sex offenders still could publish a blog, leave comments on news sites that do not require Facebook accounts, and email their friends, family, and politicians, the Indiana judge said. A sex offender also could use any social media platform restricted to adults, she added.
Copyright 2012, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).