Most participants in an April 2 meeting between crane industry representatives and Occupational Safety and Health Administration officials said the agency needs to change the crane operator testing and certification requirements set to take effect in November 2014.
The comments came during the first of three OSHA stakeholder meetings with companies and organizations impacted by the testing requirements to hear what changes, if any, OSHA should make to how it interprets the testing and certification section of the cranes and derricks in construction standard, 29 C.F.R. 1926.1427. The meetings were prompted by industry complaints (42 OSHR 1081, 12/6/12).
Jim Maddux, head of OSHA's Construction Directorate, told the approximately 50 people attending the session that OSHA's options include taking no action, changing the rule, or writing an interpretation or directive that addresses industry concerns.
Maddux indicated he did not foresee a major overhaul of the rule. “These requirements have a strong legal foundation,” he said.
Although the crane rule was approved by OSHA in 2010, the testing and certification provisions take effect Nov. 10, 2014. The rule incorporates recommendations made in 2004 by the Crane and Derrick Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee (34 OSHR 797, 7/29/04).
The industry members' primary concerns are with the “certification” and “qualification” of crane operators, how operators will be tested, and the subjects operators will be tested on, the participants told Maddux.
At the meeting there were significant differences of opinion on the definitions of “certification” and “qualification” and on who should decide whether an operator is qualified.
The standard requires operators to be certified by a third-party testing agency or by employers that use an evaluation program approved by a third-party agency.
Most of the participants said they view “certification” as fulfilling the basic requirements to operate a crane. They said “qualified” operators will have to pass additional evaluations conducted by employers to show they are capable of operating a specific crane.
Maddux pointed out the crane standard does not require employers to qualify operators. Instead, employers are required to use operators who are certified.
The different interpretations of “certified” and “qualified” were key to the discussion of OSHA's requirement that operators be certified based on the type of crane and the crane's capacity.
If OSHA requires an operator to have a third-party certification for each configuration of a crane and capacity the operator could handle, testing costs would escalate and thousands of operators certified under current voluntary consensus standards or state and local rules would have to be recertified by 2014, participants said.
Such additional costs were not envisioned when the rule went through its Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act review in 2006, some participants recalled (36 OSHR 947, 10/26/06).
If OSHA adopts a broad interpretation to being certified on the crane's type and capacity, employers will not need to recertify operators as frequently, many of the participants said. Qualifying operators for specific configurations and capacities could be done in-house by employers without the oversight and additional cost of a third party.
Another issue raised at the meeting was how OSHA should define a crane's capacity.
Typically, capacity is based on the weight the crane is designed to lift, but several participants offered other definitions. Capacity could also be based on the length of a crane's boom, the actual weight of a load to be lifted, or a combination of factors, participants said.
Also raised was the issue of testing operators for a specific weight capacity or a range of capacities. Several people suggested that instead of requiring a new certification each time an operator is assigned to a higher-capacity crane, OSHA should set broad weight categories. For example, one certifying organization approves operators for three weight groups: 0-21 tons, 22-72 tons, and 73 tons or greater.
Maddux offered few opinions during the three-hour session. After the meeting, he told BNA that OSHA has not set a timeline for when the agency will respond to the suggestions raised during the stakeholder sessions, which continue through April 3.
OSHA's information page for the cranes and derricks standard is http://www.osha.gov/cranes-derricks/.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).