Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

Criminal Law Reporter™

Product Code: CRLN21
7-Day Free Trial
Start Free Trial

What this service is:

For the professional edge in your day-to-day practice, rely on the most timely, objective reporting on significant developments, trends, and emerging patterns in criminal law today—Criminal Law Reporter.

What it helps you do:

  • Find out what experienced criminal justice professionals already know—whether you're a defense attorney, prosecutor, judge, or researcher.
  • Safeguard your client interests and stay up-to-date with coverage of federal and state court decisions, federal legislative activities, and administrative developments in criminal law.
  • Understand the impact and implications of current rulings that set precedent, examine new statutes, or tackle controversial issues.
  • Be aware of conflicts in the federal courts of appeals on questions of federal criminal law.
  • Follow U.S. Supreme Court criminal cases from filing through oral argument to final disposition. You're alerted via e-mail as soon as a pertinent decision is made. Detailed information includes titles and docket numbers, articles on oral arguments, and an annual review of the Court's decisions.
  • Make better use of your research time. Bloomberg BNA's experienced lawyer-editors sift through hundreds of cases from the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, federal district courts, principal courts of the states, and the Court of Military Appeals, reporting the decisions that matter most to criminal lawyers.
  • Get a national perspective on the latest issues, including actions and proposals by the Justice Department, U.S. Sentencing Commission, and other federal agencies, significant federal criminal legislation, appointments to federal offices, and upcoming conferences, courses, and seminars.
  • Rely on in-depth BNA Insights on important criminal justice topics, written by practitioners and academics.
Product Structure

Notification: current reports providing news and developments

Formats and Frequency

Print and Web notification formats are issued and available weekly. Print current reports are indexed quarterly, cumulating annually. Web current reports are archived to 8/07/1996. E-mail summaries, providing the highlights and table of contents for each report, with URLs to full text articles and documents, are also available.

Try Criminal Law Reporter™ now.
  • Appeals
  • Arrest
  • Capital punishment
  • Civil liability
  • Civil rights
  • Confrontation and cross-examination
  • Defenses
  • Double jeopardy
  • Drugs
  • Driving
  • Electronic surveillance and wiretapping
  • Entrapment
  • Evidence
  • Firearms
  • Forfeiture
  • Fraud
  • Grand juries
  • Guilty pleas
  • Habeas corpus
  • Immunity
  • Interrogation and confessions
  • Jury trial
  • Money laundering
  • Obscenity
  • Police misconduct
  • Prisons and jails
  • Racketeering
  • Representation by counsel
  • Search and seizure
  • Self-incrimination
  • Sentencing
  • Sex offenses
  • State constitutional law
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Witnesses
Try Criminal Law Reporter™ now.
To gain access to these articles, take a FREE TRIAL to Criminal Law Reporter™ now.
July 30, 2014
  • Ban on Mandatory LWOP for Juveniles Is Not Retroactive on Collateral Review
  • State High Court Avoids Deciding If Cell Tower Tracking Requires Warrant
  • Negotiated Cap on Sentence for Prior Didn't Keep Crime From Qualifying as ‘Felony’
  • Sentencing Is Important Enough To Justify Involuntary Medication
  • Court Must Affirmatively Offer Allocution Before Imposing Post-Revocation Sentence
  • U.S. Appeals Court May Review Denial Of International Fugitive's Motion to Dismiss
  • McNeely Rule on DUI Blood Testing Isn't Retroactive on Collateral Review
  • Iowa Police Must First Obtain Warrant Before Searching Probationer's House
  • Magistrate Judge Has Unfettered Discretion To Reopen Suppression Hearing, 8th Cir. Says
  • Defendant's Response to Anders Brief Blocks Later Challenge in Habeas Corpus
  • Waiver of Privilege in Plea Negotiations Survives Prosecution's Rescission for Breach
  • Superimposing Child's Face on Adult Body Qualifies as Child Porn Under Federal Law
  • Contraband-Cigarette Statute Requires Proof Accused Knew Packs Lacked Stamps
  • SORNA Allows Striking of Registration Data When State Constitution Demands Removal
  • Probation in Lieu of Jail Not Justified by ‘Shutdown'
  • Mandatory Minimums For Juveniles Unconstitutional
  • Expert Testimony About Narco-Saint Inadmissible
  • Treating Doctor Can Say Suspect Seemed Intoxicated
  • Collecting DNA After Arraignment Is Unconstitutional
  • Instruction to Keep Deliberating Was Adequate
  • Estranged Spouse Can't Burglarize Own Home
  • Stay Overturned, Execution Takes Two Hours
  • Courts Defer to Individual Privacy Interests by Requiring Warrant To Obtain Cell Phone Data and Cell Site Records in Riley and Davis
  • Orders of July 22–23, 2014
  • 14-3 Hoffler v. Jacon
  • 14-17 Cupples v. Michigan
  • 14-18 Carranza v. Skipper
  • 14-29 Whitman v. United States
  • 14-42 Valentine v. United States
  • 14-57 Lawrence v. United States
  • 14-59 Schultz v. Wescom
  • 14-65 Chorney v. U.S. Attorney
July 23, 2014
  • Acceptance of Guilty Plea Is ‘Too Important’ To Be Left to Magistrate Judge, 7th Cir. Says
  • Ninth Circuit Halts Arizona Execution Over Nondisclosure of Source of Lethal Drugs
  • Objection to Judge's Consideration of Issue Must Now Be Raised at Sentencing Hearing
  • General Sentencing Statute Governs Term Imposed After Mandatory Release Revocation
  • Alleyne Doesn't Require Jury Findings About Facts That Bar Safety-Valve Sentence
  • Courts Are Divided About Forfeiture Of Claims Based on Unsupported Closures
  • Lawyer Should've Mined Competency Report To Craft Mitigation Points for Penalty Phase
  • Federal Ban Against Restoring Gun Rights Applies if State Places Any Limits on Ex-Con
  • Allen Charge Needn't Inform Jury That Deadlock Will Result in Mistrial
  • Driver's Consent Allowed Search of Briefcase Even After Passenger Inquired About Warrant
  • Public Policy Doesn't Insulate Attorneys For Advice That Led to Client's Convictions
  • Bin Laden Aide Gets Mixed Results on Appeal; Ex Post Facto at Gitmo Still Open Question
  • Enemy Combatant Tort Suit Bar Is Constitutional
  • Padilla Rule Isn't Retroactive in N.Y. State Hearings
  • No Right to Extra Voir Dire After Post-Selection Plea
  • Miranda Warning Needn't Belabor Financial Liability
  • Two Crimes Counted as One Under Three-Strikes Law
  • Death-Penalty Ruling Vacated in Wake of Hall
  • Nominations and Confirmations
  • The Right of the People to Be Secure in Their Digital Papers
  • Orders of July 15–21, 2014
  • 13-1554 Garrett v. Minnesota
  • 13-1556 McClamma v. Remon
  • 14-4 Downs v. Ferriolo
July 16, 2014
  • State Court Gives Officers Lots of Leeway To Conduct Other Investigations During Stop
  • Mandatory Consecutive Firearms Sentence May Shorten Sentence for Underlying Crime
  • Motel Guest's Privacy in Dumpster Was Protected by State Constitution
  • Defendant Has Right to Cross-Examine Someone From Private Lab That Tested DNA
  • Alleyne Mandatory-Minimum Rule Didn't Bar ‘Strict-Liability' Sentence Based on Quantity
  • Obstruction of Subcommittees Is Covered By Statute That Refers to ‘Any Committee’
  • Juvenile Wasn't ‘In Custody' During Interview in Principal's Office
  • Sentence That Leaves Restitution Open Qualifies as ‘Final’ for Purposes of Appeal
  • Judge's Restitution Methodology Satisfied Paroline v. United States
  • Expert Opinion Is ‘Unreliable' Where Based On Defendant's Word He Intended No Wrong
  • Attorney Didn't Deserve to Be Sanctioned For Complaining About Slow Payment of Fees
  • Circuits Split Over Sentences for Alien Smuggling
  • Nonviolent Felon Properly Medicated for Sentencing
  • Police Can't Stop Car on Basis of Color Discrepancy
  • Supreme Court Clarifies Upshot of 2013 Decision
  • Rehearing Granted in Voir Dire Closure Case
  • Mobile Phone Digital Privacy Decision Headlines Supreme Court's 2013-14 Term
  • Supreme Court Term in Review
  • Orders of July 1, 2014
  • 13-1497 Harris v. Serpas
  • 13-1502 Hyde v. Tennessee
  • 13-1507 King v. Berghuis
  • 13-1509 Reed v. Stephens
  • 13-1512 Hammond v. United States
  • 13-1513 Algire v. California
  • 13-1517 Goins v. Lazaroff
  • 13-1518 Gause v. Haile
  • 13-1521 Bailey v. United States
  • 13-1525 Miles v. United States
  • 13-1529 Masto v. Kieren
  • 13-1531 Travis v. United States
  • 13-1533 Hornback v. United States
  • 13-1534 Tyler v. Ryan
  • 13-1537 Korman v. Superior Court of Cal.
  • 13-1539 Escobar v. Garcia
  • 13-1543 Aldawsari v. United States
  • 13-1552 Martin v. Westland
July 02, 2014
  • Digital Data Entitled to Greater Privacy Than ‘Physical Items,’ Supreme Court Says
  • Compelled Disclosure of Encryption Key Wasn't Covered by Act-of-Production Rule
  • Police Can't Indefinitely Hold Digital Files That Are Beyond Scope of Search Warrant
  • Refusal to Reoffer Plea Deal After Appeal Didn't Establish Prosecutorial Vindictiveness
  • Phone Users Lack Right to Privacy In Text Messages They Send to Others
  • Arrestee Who Waived Right to Attorney Needn't Be Told of Lawyer's Arrival at Jail
  • Delaying Presentment for Long Weekend Wasn't Justified by Interrogation of Cohort
  • Clerical Mistakes on Presentence Report May Be Corrected at Any Time, 5th Cir. Says
  • Restitution in Check-Kite Case Isn't Reduced By Collusion of Scammed Business's Principal
  • Alien Can Challenge Previous Removal On Basis of Intervening Supreme Court Ruling
  • Acquittal on Predicate Count Bars State From Pursuing Felony-Murder in Retrial
  • Revised Federal ‘Crush Video’ Law Avoids Its Predecessor's Overbreadth
  • Hall IQ Ruling Isn't Retroactive on Collateral Review
  • 11th Circuit Avoids ‘Worthless Services’ Issue
  • Criminal Solicitation Complete Once Request Is Made
  • Crime Lab Scandal Doesn't Justify Relief
  • Aiming Laser at Plane Illegal Even if No Intent to Hit
  • Scaring Jurors Is Prosecutorial Misconduct
  • Delay in Presentment Was Reasonable
  • Extra Gun Admissible in Felon-in-Possession Case
  • Nominations and Confirmations
  • Compiled Information
  • Compiled Information
  • SEARCH AND SEIZURE
  • June 30, 2014 Session
  • 13-498 Bianchi v. Chrzanowski
  • 13-994 Luna v. Texas
  • 13-999 Ibarra v. Texas
  • 13-1036 Gomez v. Texas
  • 13-1077 King v. United States
  • 13-1111 Georgia v. Roesser
  • 13-1152 Tuma v. United States
  • 13-1166 Salazar v. Missouri
  • 13-1388 Sheppard v. Virginia
  • 13-1391 Toribio v. Spece
  • 13-1392 Wozny v. Wisconsin
  • 13-1394 Edwards v. United States
  • 13-1439 Montes v. United States
  • Orders of June 25–30, 2014
  • 13-1477 Gonzalez v. Ryan
  • 13-1482 Virden v. California
  • 13-1484 Duval v. United States
  • 13-1487 Henderson v. United States
  • 13-1488 Baker v. Blake
  • 13-1490 Whitley v. Ercole
  • 13-1491 Cuti v. United States
  • 13-1493 Tennant v. United States
  • 13-1495 Kim v. Beard
Try Criminal Law Reporter™ now.