|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
Vol. 5, Nos. 1-22, pp. 1-1008 Jan. 9 -- Oct. 30, 2009 A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
WEB
See INTERNET
– Bankrupt firm's SOX liability for discharge of in-house lawyer upheld, retaliatory discharge award recalculated (DOL ARB), 279
– CPA not protected, no basis for claim of stock fraud so not covered under SOX protections (U.S., rev den), 416
– Accountants' memos to in-house attorney protected as opinion work-product, not protected by attorney-client privilege (Mass.), 366
– Draft Form 10-K sent by e-mail to various employees protected by attorney-client privilege (N.D. Ill.), 182 – Microtune Inc., court decision limiting documents protected from discovery (N.D. Tex.), counsel advising firms on internal investigations should consider, 686 – Qwest Communications, SEC officials shielded by deliberative process privilege from producing documents and responding to questions about accounting practices at issue in suit (D. Colo.), 229 – Textron, tax accrual work papers protected from IRS discovery, waiver question remanded (1st Cir.), 142; decision vacated, en banc hearing scheduled, 325; amicus brief filed in support of in-house counsel, 417; en banc pane refuses to give protection (1st Cir.), 775; for use in possible litigation test may have far-reaching implications, analysis, 799; SEC comments on decision, 993 Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
