www.bna.com Expert Evidence Report
HomeIndexTable of CasesFeedbackwww.bna.com

Printable version (PDF) 

INDEX
Vol. 9, Nos 1-21, pp. 1-560
Jan. 5 - Nov. 9, 2009

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

    ADA
    ADEA
    ADMISSIBILITY
      – Causation
      – Endangered species act violations, defense testimony of former zoo curator improperly barred (9th Cir.), 502
      – Medical causation
      – Methodology
      – Qualifications
      – Securities fraud, ethics training testimony admissible to show knowledge and intent (8th Cir.), 501
      – Sufficiency
      – Testing
      – Videotape made by unidentified technician fails to satisfy authentication rule (Md.), 8
    AFFIDAVITS
      – Airline passenger records, expert's affidavit faulty, EU Parliament member's suit against DHS dismissed (D.D.C.), 34
      – Case management, use and limitations of Lone Pine orders, Analysis & Perspective, 101
      – Electronic records, computer expert's affidavit cited in ordering county to try to recover deleted e-mails (Ohio), 6
      – Legal malpractice, attorney's affidavit of competency of own conduct set aside (Wyo.), 119
      – Medical malpractice
        – – Failure to file supporting affidavit requires dismissal of claim over fall in hospital (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.), 27
        – – Orthopedic specialist affidavit silent on license to practice information insufficient (Tenn. Ct. App.), 289
        – – Physician letters not in affidavit form not admissible as expert opinions (Mass. App. Ct.), 233
      – Motor vehicle design defects, conclusory affidavit insufficient (E.D. Mich.), 427
      – Product liability, affidavit may be used to cure unsworn expert report (8th Cir.), 416
      – Response to request by referring to previously provided medical records may be amended (Miss.), 332
    AGE DISCRIMINATION
      – Studies, admission for failure to timely object to inadmissible state investigative study impermissible sanction (Mont.), 471
    AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT (ADEA)
      – Firefighters, physical fitness test failure fails to raise triable issue (D. Ore.), 318
      – Navy employee failed to present statistical proof that new training program amounted to bias (11th Cir.), 38
    AGRICULTURE
      See also FOOD
      – Product liability, “resistant” seeds in crop harm case, expert proof on meaning barred (D. Ariz.), 91
    AIR TRANSPORTATION
      – Airline passenger records, expert's affidavit faulty, EU Parliament member's suit against DHS dismissed (D.D.C.), 34
      – China, airline crash suit allowed to move on basis of improved legal system (Cal. Ct. App.), 113
      – Pilot license revocation, positive drug test, estimates as to time detection possible not categorical pronouncements requiring inadmissibility (11th Cir.), 349
    ALABAMA
      – Class actions, expert report based on benchmark amounts paid for uninsured health patients insufficient basis for certification (Ala.), 505
      – Legal malpractice, bank claiming out-of-state firm failed to meet standard of care requires expert proof (Ala.), 527
      – Medical malpractice, cervical epidural steroid injection as cause of paralysis, res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on (Ala.), 291
      – Zyprexa-caused diabetes, failure to warn, expert testimony linking weight gain sufficient to deny summary judgment (E.D.N.Y.), 475
    AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
      – Hearing discrimination, UPS agrees to settlement requiring experts' panel to develop new standards for hard-of-hearing drivers (N.D. Cal.), 316
      – Reasonable accommodation, expert proof in conflict with plaintiff's testimony rejected (W.D. Mich.), 507
    ANALYSIS & PERSPECTIVE
      – Accounting, forensic experts
        – – Fee recovery through criminal restitution, 194
        – – Securities, fair value, 298
      – Bankruptcy proceeding, attorney-client privilege re expert witnesses, 402
      – Case management, use and limitations of Lone Pine orders, 101
      – Causation, anecdotal expert proof in product liability litigation, 70
      – Costs of expert review, “quick peek” suggested as solution, 322
      – Discovery, data collection, need for consulting forensic experts, 533
      – E-discovery
        – – Automated search and retrieval tools, impact on need for experts, 459
        – – Criminal proceedings, key issues involved in electronically stored information, 268
        – – In-house re hired experts, pros and cons, 170
        – – Inadvertently produced documents, clawback agreements, 510
        – – Lawyers' responsibilities when hiring services, need for industry code of conduct, 375
        – – Wiping program discovery leads to spoilation of evidence adverse ruling, Analysis & Perspective, 433
      – Environment
        – – Damages, property value diminution due to toxic contamination, 129
        – – Diminished role of experts after Burlington Northern & Santa Fe, 350
      – Financial fraud and subprime litigation, role of expert in class certification and loss causation, 484
      – Lay witnesses, limiting testimony, 217
      – Online search for experts, 556
    ANTITRUST
      – Class actions
        – – Baby products, expert used to show common evidence of price fixing injury (E.D. Pa.), 399
        – – Cigarettes, economist testimony on parallelism of price leads to reinstatement of class action (N.M. Ct. App.), 239
        – – Damages
          – – – Calculations on lost sales and price differential excluded (W.D. Okla.), 33
          – – – Econometric multiple regression analysis sufficient to establish class (D. Conn.), 166
        – – Pineapples, DOJ and FCC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, testimony failing to comply with guides and cherry picking of details rejected (S.D.N.Y.), 522
        – – Weight of conflicting proof integral, district court must resolve dispute before certifying (3d Cir.), 37
      – Damages
        – – Class actions
          See Class actions, this heading
        – – Estimates, economist testimony relying on untested data from unknown source fails Daubert test (D. Del.), 451
      – Discovery, tobacco pricing data, protective order allowing plaintiff's experts access rejected (S.D.N.Y.), 53
      – Price fixing
        – – Methodology sufficiently reliable to allow consideration by jury (S.D. W. Va.), 213
        – – Statistical proof, econometric opinion not barred (N.D. Ga.), 119
    APPAREL
      – Product safety and liability, flammability of bathrobe, expert evidence not required, suit fails to survive summary judgment (3d Cir.), 13
    ARIZONA
      – Criminal procedure, IQ assessment requires defendant experts to conduct original testing (Ariz.), 520
      – Medical malpractice, expert witness standards statute not violation of separation of powers (Ariz.), 163
    ARKANSAS
      – House fire, space heater, testimony inadmissible for lack of testing (8th Cir.), 57
      – Sound of car running over body, expert identification not required in criminal trial (Ark.), 38
    ASBESTOS
      – Automobile brakes
        – – Experts not required to disprove defendant's hypotheses to carry burden of reliability and relevance (Del. Super. Ct.), 209
        – – Lack of epidemiological studies, researchers with 30 years experience link carcinogenic qualities of unrefined and refined chrysotile fibers (Del.), 454
      – Indoor air studies may be used by government in environmental crimes trial (D. Mont.), 94
      – Joint compound manufacturer, jury allocation of damages in multiproduct exposure case rejected (Cal. Ct. App.), 238
      – Paper mill dryer felts, scientific evidence on released particles relevant (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.), 430
      – Real property contamination class action, conflicting expert opinions required to be resolved pre-certification (Colo. Ct App.), 397
      – Seaman's exposure
        – – Testimony based on assumption of exposure on particular ship insufficient to uphold verdict (N.D. Ohio), 211
        – – Third-party products, state law does not require warning of hazards (Cal. Ct. App.), 127
    ATTORNEYS
      – Fees, former judge without specialized or technical knowledge testimony rejected as unhelpful (Ky. Ct. App.), 550
      – Ineffective assistance of counsel
        – – Failure of child molestation defendant's counsel to call interview expert not grounds for reversal of conviction (Ind. App.), 127
        – – Failure to call expert on child forensic interviews showing consistency as coaching not error (Ind. App.), 296
      – Legal malpractice
        – – Affidavit set aside as failing to show competency of attorney's own conduct (Wyo.), 119
        – – Selection and use of experts, key issues discussed at conference, 168
      – Physician-attorney testifying as necessary witness may not represent party (Tenn. Ct. App.), 227
      – Privileged communications
      – Qualifications of experts, patent lawyer lacking technical expertise may not testify on invalidity, noninfringement (Fed. Cir.), 30
      – Tax fraud, accountant's conviction set aside for failure of counsel to retain tax expert (N.D. Ill.), 373
      – Winning strategies for using experts, ABA conference, 243
    ATTORNEYS' FEES
      – Medical malpractice
        – – Post-dismissal order seeking fees may appeal refusal to dismiss expert report (Tex.), 370
        – – Refusal to grant after dismissal of action for lack of expert report improper (Tex.), 370
    AUTOMOBILES

Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com
1801 S. Bell Street, Arlington, VA 22202 - Phone: 1-800-372-1033

Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.