![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Vol. 9, Nos 1-21, pp. 1-560 Jan. 5 - Nov. 9, 2009 A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
JOB BIAS
– Wikipedia insufficiently reliable to qualify (N.J. Super. Ct.), 257
– Class Action Fairness Act local controversy exception, defendants fail to qualify (N.D. Ind.), 553
– Asbestos, joint compound manufacturer, jury allocation of damages in multiproduct exposure case rejected (Cal. Ct. App.), 238
– Constructive possession of drugs, testimony improperly invaded jury's province, conviction reversed (N.J.), 98 – DNA testing
– – Presence of criminal defendant in federal database, testimony on did not lead to presumption defendant had criminal history (Ill.), 97
– – Prosecutor's closing comment concerning Hollywood effect on jury expectations insufficient to required new trial (7th Cir.), 214 – Finding of no breach of standard of care, exclusion of expert causation testimony harmless error (Conn.), 235 – Human trafficking expert testimony usurped jury function (8th Cir.), 236 – Instructions
– – Disk-wiping software, expert testimony on presence sufficient for adverse jury instruction (D. Colo.), 182
– – Medical malpractice
– – – Negligence finding requires expert testimony (Cal. Ct. App.), 395
– – – Rocky Mt. Spotted Fever, standard of care instructions misstated law (Ga.), 361 – – Res ipsa loquitur, testimony on common knowledge rejected for lack of foundation (N.J), 383 – – Signature falsification, instruction on culpability drawn from fabrication of evidence induces settlement (N.D. Cal.), 545 – – Spoilation of electronic records, ability to cross-examine expert results in neutral instruction (N.H.), 182 – Winning strategies for using experts, ABA conference, 243 Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |