www.bna.com Expert Evidence Report
HomeIndexTable of CasesFeedbackwww.bna.com

Printable version (PDF) 

INDEX
Vol. 9, Nos 1-21, pp. 1-560
Jan. 5 - Nov. 9, 2009

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

    TAXATION
      – Embezzlement, tax expert's testimony on ERISA plan properly excluded (5th Cir.), 116
      – Fraud, accountant's conviction set aside for failure of counsel to retain tax expert (N.D. Ill.), 373
      – Legal opinion properly excluded (9th Cir.), 155
      – Offers in compromise, favoring one appraiser's valuation over another not abuse of discretion (3d Cir.), 528
      – State agency with no expertise in differentiating computers, copiers, and faxes not entitled to deference (Wis. Ct. App.), 430
      – Subpoenas, expert's return and financial records barred from discovery to prove bias (M.D. Tenn.), 205
    TENNESSEE
      – Emergency room standard of care, physician unqualified to testify (Tenn. Ct. App.), 289
      – Hearing loss, one-day test of noise level not sufficient to overturn award (Tenn.), 482
      – Medical malpractice
        – – Drug overdose, neuropharmacologist lacks medical expertise (Tenn. Ct. App.), 548
        – – Hysterectomy, obstetrician qualified to testify infection caused death (Tenn. Ct. App.), 212
        – – Locality rule
          – – – Large metropolitan practice physician may testify on standards in small community (Tenn. Ct. App.), 524
          – – – Plastic surgery, familiarity with similar communities sufficient (Tenn. Ct. App.), 398
        – – Nurse's unfamiliarity with locality's standard of care bars testimony over fall from wheelchair (Tenn. Ct. App.), 35
        – – Ordered exam establishes physician-patient relationship requiring expert proof of negligence claim (Tenn. Ct. App.), 364
        – – Orthopedic specialist affidavit silent on license to practice information insufficient (Tenn. Ct. App.), 289
        – – Physician-attorney testifying as necessary witness may not represent party (Tenn. Ct. App.), 227
        – – Physician from Mo. excluded for not demonstrating familiarity with state law (Tenn. Ct. App.), 93
      – Misidentification of newborn baby, emotional distress claim requires expert proof (Tenn. Ct. App.), 69
      – Qualifications, mental capacity of criminal defendant, physician improperly excluded (Tenn.), 58
      – Sex offender with sleep disorder, self-reported medical history improperly excluded (Tenn.), 56
      – Workers' compensation, expert causation proof required (Tenn.), 505
    TESTING
      – ADEA, firefighter physical fitness test failure fails to raise triable issue (D. Ore.), 318
      – Blood tests, duty of physician to order, trial judge improperly entered judgment notwithstanding verdict when testimony was adequate to support award (Ill. App. Ct.), 99
      – Building block manufacturer's claim that competitor's promotion of its own blocks was false disproved by testing of blocks (W.D. Wash.), 10
      – DNA
      – Ground water contamination, hydrologist's testimony on third-party tests excluded as speculative (4th Cir.), 31
      – Hearing loss, one-day test of noise level not sufficient to overturn award (Tenn.), 482
      – House fire, space heater, testimony inadmissible for lack of testing (8th Cir.), 57
      – Ladders
        – – Use of own test by expert properly excluded (E.D. Tenn.), 91
        – – Weight test, failure to perform does not warrant dismissal (7th Cir.), 116
      – Superfund cost recovery, soil sample evidence barred for loss of samples and test data (D. Conn.), 280
    TEXAS
      – Benzene
        – – Leukemia, expert proof failed to establish exposure contributed to (Tex. App.), 100
        – – Negligent closure of landfill, expert proof fails to show exposure caused leukemia (Tex.), 253
      – Biased experts, testimony before administrative law judge not denial of due process (Tex. App.), 191
      – Condemned property easement, income method of appraisal improperly excluded (Tex.), 366
      – Design defects, commercial trailers, safer alternative fails to meet risk-utility analysis (Tex.), 313
      – Discovery
        – – E-discovery
          – – – Rummage through hard drive requires some showing that evidence is available and retrievable (Tex.), 442
          – – – Special master review of computer hard drive for relevance, stay of lower court order granted pending review (Tex.), 497
        – – Untimely expert evidence may be excluded at summary judgment (Tex.), 227
      – Expert reports
        – – Fair summary in compliance with statute, refusal to dismiss upheld (Tex. App.), 113
        – – Hospital bed defect claim deemed product liability action not requiring report (Tex.), 443
        – – Medical malpractice
          – – – Attorneys' fees, refusal to grant after dismissal of action for lack of expert report improper (Tex.), 370
          – – – Emergency medicine, substantial training and experience sufficient to qualify (Tex. App.), 385
          – – – Licensed counselor deemed qualified health provider (Tex. App.), 469
          – – – Negligent discharge, report containing series of repetitious and conclusory statement insufficient (Tex. App.), 418
          – – – Order seeking attorneys' fees may appeal refusal of dismissal of report post dismissal (Tex.), 370
          – – – Respondeat superior and statutory liability, vicarious liability claims not required to provide separate report (Tex.), 206
          – – – Sanctions for failure to file survive nonsuit order (Tex.), 281
          – – – Standard of care, separate reports required for each defendant (Tex. App.), 207
          – – – Timeliness
            See Timeliness of filing, this subheading
        – – Nursing home neglect of patients, report required (Tex. App.), 256
        – – Slip and fall claim not action requiring report (Tex. App.), 370
        – – Timeliness of filing
          – – – Filing within 120 days of amended petition naming new doctor defendants proper (Tex. App.), 370
          – – – Mailings, ordinary postal mail received before expiration of period meets requirements (Tex. App.), 470
          – – – Mandamus unavailable to defendant to appeal extension for plaintiff to file (Tex.), 65
          – – – 120-day period relates to filing date of original petition (Tex. App.), 386
          – – – Service of report prior to filing of claim improper (Tex. App.), 87
          – – – Trial court may grant extension for revision of conclusory report (Tex.), 7
      – Jury may disregard expert testimony (Tex. App.), 431
      – Killing of pregnant woman's embryo, medical proof of early pregnancy not possible from mere observation, conviction rejected (Tex. Crim. App.), 39
      – Laser hair removal, negligence claim does not require expert report (Tex. App.), 185
      – Medical malpractice
        – – Chiropractor not qualified to testify on causation (Tex. App.), 53
        – – Dental malpractice, removal of wrong tooth, reasonable medical probability meets threshold (Tex. App.), 421
        – – Expert reports, sanctions for failure to file report survive nonsuit order (Tex.), 281
        – – Patient admissions, physician allowed to testify on standard of care when patient requests specific doctor (Tex. App.), 447
        – – Qualifications of expert
          See Qualifications of expert, this heading
        – – State expert report rule does not apply to cases removed to federal court (S.D. Tex.), 11
        – – Substitute doctor qualified to testify in obstetrics case (Tex. App.), 26
        – – Surgeon need not perform same procedure to testify as expert (Tex. App.), 228
        – – Timeliness of reports
          See Expert reports, this heading
      – Qualifications of expert
        – – Anesthesiologist, experience, education, and training sufficient to allow opinion on positioning and padding of patient during surgery (Tex. App.), 545
        – – Bypass surgery, emergency room and attending ICU physician not qualified to testify on formulation of ICU policy and procedure (Tex. App.), 520
        – – Objection to expert must be brought within 21 days (Tex. App.), 88
        – – Pharmaceuticals, physician in medical malpractice suit failed to demonstrate expertise on causation (Tex. App.), 112
    TIMELINESS
      – Age discrimination, admission of inadmissible state investigative study for failure to timely object impermissible sanction (Mont.), 471
      – Deadline extension for naming experts, excusable neglect standard not applicable to untimely motions (Wis. Ct. App.), 184
      – Discovery, untimely expert evidence may be excluded at summary judgment (Tex.), 227
      – Expert reports, timeliness of filing
        – – Filing 3 months after deadline excluded (9th Cir.), 187; (U.S. rev sought), 367
        – – Filing within 120 days of amended petition naming new doctor defendants proper (Tex. App.), 370
        – – Mailings, ordinary postal mail received before expiration of period meets requirements (Tex. App.), 470
        – – Mandamus unavailable to defendant to appeal extension for plaintiff to file (Tex.), 65
        – – Service of report prior to filing of claim improper (Tex. App.), 87
        – – State-owned hospital, claim against requires timely filing of reports under Medical Liability Act and Tort Claim Act (Tex. App.), 229
        – – Tex. 120-day period relates to filing date of original petition (Tex. App.), 386
        – – Trial court may grant extension for revision of conclusory report (Tex.), 7
        – – Untimely preemptive rebuttal report not grounds for expanding scope (S.D. Ind.), 183
      – Qualifications of expert, objection must be brought within 21 days (Tex. App.), 88
    TITLE VII
    TOBACCO INDUSTRY
      – Antitrust
        – – Price fixing, economist testimony on parallelism of price leads to reinstatement of class action (N.M. Ct. App.), 239
        – – Pricing data, protective order allowing plaintiff's experts access rejected (S.D.N.Y.), 53
      – Menthol cigarette dangers, expert report filed in Israeli class action, 257
    TOXIC SUBSTANCES
    TOYS AND GAMES
      – False advertising, building block manufacturer fails on claim that competitor's promotion of its own blocks was false (W.D. Wash.), 10
    TRADEMARKS
      – Distinctiveness, expert testimony on history of Chippendales cuffs and collars not helpful (TTBA), 193
    TRANSPORTATION
    TREATISES
      – Judicial notice, Wikipedia insufficiently reliable to qualify (N.J. Super. Ct.), 257

Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com
1801 S. Bell Street, Arlington, VA 22202 - Phone: 1-800-372-1033

Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.