![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Vol. 25, Nos. 1 - 26, pp. 1 - 740 Jan. 7 -- Dec. 23, 2009 A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
PATENTS
– Conflicts of interest, firm representing builder of proposed office building may not withdraw from representing other client who opposes proposal (Philadelphia Bar Ass'n Op.), 447
– Facebook page, lawyers may not mislead witnesses into granting access to (Philadelphia Bar Ass'n Op.), 218 – Fees, adoption court may not sua sponte reduce based on notions of reasonableness (Pa. Super. Ct.), 490 – Frivolous appeal by criminal defendant, contents of Anders brief (Pa.), In Brief, 492 – In-house counsel, fees for special admission, Analysis and Perspective, 95 – Ineffective assistance, no prejudice presumed despite deficient brief by appellate counsel (Pa.), 353 – Job bias claim against firm, shareholder not required to arbitrate (3d Cir.), 159 – Malpractice, courts have no duty to find viable theories in complaint (Pa.), 236 – Metadata embedded in electronic documents, lawyers may use (Pa. Op.), 245
– Charging excessive fee and unquestioning acceptance of supervisor instructions, lawyer reprimanded (Ohio), 692
– Incompetence not valid basis for disqualification (Wash. Ct. App.), In Brief, 730 – Malpractice, conferees discuss highest-risk areas of law practice, 536 – Solicitation of families of air crash victims, lawyer settles charges of violating federal law, 530
See LAW FIRMS
– Attorney-client privilege
– Litigation privilege, malpractice
– – Mid-trial settlement offer, absolute privilege protects attorney letter (Cal. Ct. App.), 125
– – Settlement letter, statements by opposing counsel protected (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), 10 – Work product protections
See WORK PRODUCT
– Tenn. rules seek to boost lawyer provision, In Brief, 226
– Advice to seek counsel, lawyer dealing with self-represented person may go beyond (New York City Op.), 194
– Attorneys' fees
– – Defective home construction, lawyer representing himself and wife not entitled to fees (Cal. Ct. App.), 556
– – Rule 11 sanctions
– – – Frivolous suit, lawyer defending self not entitled to fees (Cal.), 51
– – – Pro se lawyer not entitled to fees after opponent sanctioned re frivolous suit (Md. Ct. Spec. App.), 585 – Defendants, prosecutors may negotiate pleas with (Wis. Op.), 195; text of rule, 196 – Limited assistance representations, Mass. to allow, 255 – Settlement agreement indemnification clause allows pro se lawyer to collect contractual fees (La. Ct. App.), In Brief, 593 – Suspended lawyer disbarred for asserting frivolous defense while acting pro se during suspension (Va.), 251
– Appeals
See APPEALS
See ARBITRATION
See CLASS ACTIONS
See DISCOVERY
– Res judicata, fraud claims against lawyer of opponent need not be joined to suit against opponent (Minn. Ct. App.), 401 – Rule 11 sanctions
See STANDING
– Conflicts of interest
– – Defendant testifying against family member in separate case, prosecutor may not try case against (Ind.), In Brief, 645
– – Hiring lawyer who earlier represented defendant, no per se rule disqualifying entire office (Utah), 467 – – Post-conviction relief waivers, scope of plea agreements limited (Mo. Op.), 327; views of ethics committees from other states, 327 – Defense lawyer suspended for offering to stay quiet about prosecutorial misconduct in exchange for dismissal of charges (Neb.), 452 – DOJ Professional Responsibility Office, Brown named head, 203 – E-mail messages sent to personal counsel at work protected (D.D.C.), In Brief, 729 – Ex parte contact with witness represented in related suit improper (Neb. Op.), 219 – Exculpatory information, duty to disclose goes beyond Brady obligation (ABA Op.), 471 – Misconduct, intimidation of witnesses, stock option backdating suit against Broadcom execs dismissed (C.D. Cal.), 738 – Post-trial DNA testing, absolute immunity shields delay in revealing (2d Cir.), 683 – Pro se defendants, prosecutors may negotiate pleas with (Wis. Op.), 195; text of rule, 196 – Screen in 2-person office effective (Mich. Ct. App.), In Brief, 688 – Sharing information improperly
– – Explicit photos of minors, prosecutor suspended (Kan.), 61
– – Informer data, supervisory prosecutor has absolute immunity from civil rights suit over failure to train other lawyers (U.S., judg rvs), 58 – Trial conduct, judge who dismissed Stevens (R-Alaska) case orders probe of top prosecutors (D.D.C.), 202 – Use of PowerPoint jigsaw puzzle in closing argument improper (Cal. Ct. App.), In Brief, 644
– Conflicts of interest, none found since initial consultation did not create lawyer-client relationship (W. Va.), 359
– Lawyer-client relationship, protection of information during possible referral talks (D.C. Op.), 130 – Malpractice, potential clients may sue for bad advice during initial interview (Colo. Ct. App.), 104
– Anders briefs for meritless appeals
– – Appointed counsel may not use (Ind.), 384
– – Contents of brief detailed (Pa.), In Brief, 492
– – Entire office, conflicts not always imputed to (Idaho), 285
– – Post-conviction relief waivers, scope of plea agreements limited (Mo. Op.), 327; views of ethics committees from other states, 327
– – ABA approves guidelines for managing, 418
– – Failure to move to withdraw ineffective (Cal. Ct. App.), 163 – Part-time contract lawyers using same county office not associated with each other in firm (Ind.), 171 Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |