Energy and Climate Report provides current, thorough coverage of clean energy, efficiency, and climate change legislation, regulation, policy, legal developments, and trends in the U.S. and...
By Dean Scott
Oct. 17 — Negotiators from nearly 200 nations who reached a deal over the weekend to cut 80 percent of super-polluting hydrofluorocarbons by midcentury also agreed to periodically revisit whether to reduce climate emissions even more as new control technologies come online.
The global deal reached Oct. 15 targets consumption and production of HFCs used in air conditioning and refrigeration that, if left unchecked, would have an outsized impact on raising global temperatures.
All countries under the deal reached after a week of talks in Kigali, Rwanda, agreed to phase down HFCs. But the U.S. and other richer industrialized countries, many of which already are cutting HFCs, essentially will go first. They agreed to a 10 percent reduction in the refrigerant beginning in 2019.
Developing countries were given longer to take action, with China and most other developing economies agreeing to a freeze in 2024; India and a few other nations fought for and won a 2028 freeze date.
The Kigali amendment calls for periodic reviews of the global action phasing down HFCs every five years; a technical panel is to determine whether technologies have emerged to allow “any needed adjustments” in agreed-upon reductions, according to a White House fact sheet.
Under the deal, the U.S. and other richer nations agreed to begin ratcheting down HFCs in 2019 and continue doing so until 2036. At that time, the developed nations are to achieve an 85 percent cut from 2011–2013 production and consumption levels. President Barack Obama pursued the global deal on HFCs to complement the broader climate accord reached in Paris 10 months ago. Obama called the Kigali deal “an ambitious and far-reaching solution to this looming crisis” that makes “a significant contribution towards achieving the goals we set in Paris.”
But the deal provides a sort of sliding scale for developing nations, with one group—China, Latin America, Africa and island nations—agreeing to a freeze by 2024. That group covers the bulk of developing nations around the world, more than 100 total, according to the World Wildlife Fund.
A second tier of developing nations headed by India, which sought to delay any HFC freeze until about 2030 given its increasing demands for air conditioning for its burgeoning middle class, conceded to a slightly earlier freeze date of 2028 in the deal. Others in that group were given until 2028 to take action include Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and some Persian Gulf nations.
The deal was reached was reached as an amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which has been successfully used to phase out substances that deplete the ozone layer. The Kigali negotiations served as the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone.
Hydrofluorocarbons originally were developed as alternatives to ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). But HFCs were later determined to be a potent greenhouse gases with long atmospheric lifetimes and thus a significant contributor to global warming. Consequently, HFCs can be hundreds or even thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide in contributing to climate change.
Steep reductions in HFCs will require nations to move to alternatives with a lower global warming impact and increase energy efficiency, particularly in air conditioning units. Already existing more climate-friendly HFC alternatives include HFO-1234yf, developed jointly by Honeywell and Dupont.
The Rwanda deal was seen as icing on the cake for climate action, coming less than a year after nearly 200 nations reached the first truly global deal in Paris to address climate change, but also just weeks after a deal was announced to cut international aviation emissions of carbon dioxide. The aviation deal was reached Oct. 6 after roughly two decades of negotiations under the UN International Civil Aviation Organization.
Regine Guenther, interim leader of WWF’s Global Climate and Energy Practice, said the Oct. 15 Kigali deal on HFCs “sends a powerful signal that our governments are serious about tackling climate change, coming as it does on the heels of the ratification of the Paris Agreement, a new deal to cap aviation emissions and just weeks before UN climate talks resume” in Morocco.
The Morocco talks got a boost with faster-than-anticipated ratification of the Paris Agreement this year by enough developed and developing nations to ensure it is formally in place in time for the two-week UN climate change conference in Marrakech, which opens Nov. 7. At the summit, countries will begin the first negotiations on how to implement the Paris Agreement, including a kind of rule book countries will use to measure and verify whether they make good on their pledges to cut emissions.
Mattlan Zackhras, a minister to the Marshall Islands—among the nations most vulnerable to sea-level rise linked to climate change—said hours before nations clinched the Oct. 15 Rwanda deal that deep cuts in HFCs “may be the single biggest bite we ever take out of the global mitigation gap in one go.”
While HFCs are today responsible for only about 1 percent to 2 percent of global warming, they are the fastest growing climate-related emissions.
If left unaddressed, global emissions of HFCs would grow to the equivalent of 19 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in 2050, according to the White House; steep reductions during the coming decades could prevent nearly a half-degree Celsius of warming this century, the White House projects.
Durwood Zaelke, who has tracked the talks as president of the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development, said the promised reductions get the world to about 90 percent of the goal of cutting a half degree Celsius of global warming this century.
To contact the reporter on this story: Dean Scott in Washington at DScott@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)