The Bloomberg BNA Estate Tax Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues. The ideas presented here are those of individuals and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.
Friday, June 3, 2011
The recent publication of Private Letter Ruling 200939003 by the IRS is a timely reminder of the potential use of IRC §6166 to defer payment of the generation-skipping transfer tax. In the ruling, Grandfather had established a trust for Child, funding it with the stock of an S corporation. Child was to receive the trust assets upon reaching a specified age, but died before attaining that age. Under these circumstances, the trust provided that the assets were to remain in further trust for Grandchild, causing a taxable termination subject to the GST tax.
The trust presumably still held the S corporation stock, because the trustee sought a ruling that it could elect under IRC §6166 to pay the GST tax in installments. The trustee pointed out that §2661(2) states that, if a generation-skipping transfer occurs as a result of and at the same time as the death of an individual (as happened here), "all provisions of subtitle F . . . applicable to the estate tax . . . are hereby made applicable in respect of the generation-skipping transfer tax." Section 6166 is found in subtitle F, and it would seem that §6166 relief was available.
But the Service denied the request, observing that it would be difficult to apply §6166 in the context of the GST tax. Furthermore, it pointed out that §6166(i) provides that §6166 deferral is available for the GST tax only when the closely held business is the subject of a direct skip occurring "at the same time as and as a result of the decedent's death."
Although the trustee's request was unsuccessful, this ruling is a useful reminder that, under the right circumstances, there are opportunities for deferring payment of the GST tax. If any reader has successfully done this, or contemplated doing it, we would be interested in their comments.
— Harold W. Pskowski, Managing Editor for Estates, Gifts and Trusts
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Bloomberg BNA Releases New Portfolio 870-1st -- Private Placement Life Insurance and Annuities
Conservation Easements: Appraisals don't have to be Tidy to be Qualified
IRS Finally Provides Guidance on Choice-of-Law Issues Left Unresolved by United States v. Windsor
Anomaly In Proposed Regulations May Result In Ordinary Income Items Being Taxed As Net Investment Income When Distributed To CRT Beneficiaries
Projected Inflation-Adjusted Amounts for 2014