+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Nov. 18 --The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Nov. 15 affirmed the dismissal of a would-be securities class action accusing Kid Brands Inc.(KID) of misleading investors about the company's financial performance and compliance with customs laws (Rahman v. Kid Brands, Inc. , 3d Cir., No. 12-4257, 11/15/13).
Judge Morton Ira Greenberg agreed with the lower court that plaintiff Shah Rahman failed to plead scienter with sufficient particularity under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
On March 15, 2011, the appeals court said, Kid Brands disclosed that one of its subsidiaries had violated U.S. law by “misidentifying the manufacturer and shipper of certain products” and that it anticipated $7 million in fines to resolve issues arising from the CBP assessment. As a result, Kid Brands' stock price fell significantly by the end of that day. Five months later, Kid Brands filed a Form 10-Q and issued a Form 8-K, indicating that two of its other subsidiaries had evaded custom duties, and that it estimated over $10 million in liabilities “for wrongful practices extending over a period of nearly five years.” As a result, Kid Brands' stock price fell even more.
Rahman filed the would-be securities class action on March 22, 2011 against Kid Brands and its officers, alleging violations of 1934 Securities Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 20(a), and Rule 10b-5. The lower court dismissed Rahman's first and second amended complaints, finding that Rahman failed to satisfy PSRLA's heightened scienter pleading standard. Rahman appealed.
Further, the appeals court held that Rahman's allegations “cannot support the existence of” corporate scienter. We “neither have accepted nor rejected the doctrine of corporate scienter in securities fraud actions, and we do not do so now,” it explained.
The appeals court added that even if it were to recognize the doctrine of corporate scienter, Rahman's case “would not come within the doctrine” and would not survive a dismissal motion.As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's order, dismissing the second amended complaint with prejudice.
Kid Brands and the individual defendants were represented by Robert J. Del Tufo, Jay B. Kasner, Christopher R. Gette, Rachel J. Barnett, Matthew S. Barkan, and Andrew Muscato of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher& Flom, Newark, N.J. and New York; Eric B. Fisher and Jeffrey Rhodes of Dickstein Shapiro, New York and Washington; Stefano V. Calogero of Windels, Marx, Lane & Mittendorf, Madison, N.J.; and Rebecca Brazzano, C. Dennis Southard IV, and David A. Wilson of Thompson Hine, Washington.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).