New York Times lawyer David McCraw has become famous for penning the paper’s widely shared response to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s demand that it retract a critical story. Turns out McCraw tucked that task into a day that also involved devising a response to what he considers a patent lawsuit of dubious merit.
Last Wednesday, Trump’s lawyer Marc E. Kasowitz sent a letter demanding that the Times retract an article containing allegations that Trump inappropriately touched two women. The letter said the story was libelous and a “politically-motivated effort to defeat Mr. Trump’s candidacy.”
The next day, McCraw responded that the Times would not retract the story. He argued that a libel claim concerns the protection of reputation, and none of the accusations in the article “has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.”
The letter went viral, and the Times followed up with a behind the scenes look. McCraw explained he wrote the letter on Thursday in about 45 minutes, just before a conference call about a new patent infringement lawsuit filed against the Times in Texas.
“Is somebody really claiming to have invented a method for switching from watching one video to watching another?” he asks.
McCraw doesn’t discuss the patent case in any more detail, but according to Bloomberg Law data, a company called Bartonfalls LLC sued the New York Times Company Oct. 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, asserting U.S. Patent No. 7,917,922 covering a “method of automatically changing from a first TV program to an alternate TV program at a TV viewer location.”
Bartonfalls filed 14 lawsuits that day, asserting the patent against a wide variety of defendants, including NBCUniversal Media LLC, Turner Broadcasting System Inc., Viacom Inc. and Bloomberg BNA’s parent company, Bloomberg LP.
At the time of this writing, the Times article on Trump is still available online. And the company has yet to answer in the Bartonfalls case.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)