Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

An Enforceable Patent Built from the Ground Up



Thursday, October 18, 2012
Product Code - LGN61
Speaker(s): Andrew T. Spence, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP; Kimberly Bullock Gatling, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP
Add To Cart
The U.S. patent system generally has two types of requirements for obtaining and enforcing a patent. These two types may be distinguished as those that focus on prior art and those that do not. Emphasis is often placed on meeting prior art-related requirements. But because statute or case law provides support for the invalidity or unenforceability of patents and claims for failure to comply with non-prior art-related requirements, these requirements are often just as important.

This program will cover topics including inventors and inventorship, the written description and enablement disclosure requirements, and the duty of candor and Information Disclosure Statement practice. Our faculty will also introduce the related topics of statutory subject matter and single-actor claiming. They will not only include a discussion of these topics highlighted by relevant case law but will also provide practical tips for staying on top of non-prior art-related requirements.

Educational Objectives:

• Recognize issues that may arise from non-prior art-related requirements for obtaining and enforcing a patent.
• Learn to draft, file and prosecute patent applications with a focus on non-prior art-related requirements to avoid certain issues from arising later.
• Find out about corrective measures that may be taken relative to a pending application or issued patent should an issue arise from certain non-prior art-related requirements.
• Gain an appreciation of non-prior art related requirements for obtaining and enforcing a patent as well as practical tips for dealing with those requirements.

Who would benefit from attending the program?

PTO stakeholders including practitioners, applicants and industry participants, particularly those with more day-to-day involvement in patent matters (both in-house counsel and law firms of all sizes).

Program Level: Intermediate.

Credit Available: CLE. For more information, please click on the “CLE Credit” tab.

Andrew T. Spence, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP; Kimberly Bullock Gatling, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP

Andrew T. Spence, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP
Andy Spence is a partner in the patent group of Smith Moore Leatherwood and concentrates his practice in the area of intellectual property focusing on patent procurement in the electrical, computer software and business method arts. He has over eleven years of experience handling complex patent matters for companies in various fields covering a number of diverse technologies, including telecommunications, aerospace and e-commerce.  He has also handled post-issuance patent matters including ex parte and inter partes reexamination, has assisted clients in patent interference and reissue proceedings, and regularly counsels clients on a number of other intellectual property matters including patent infringement, validity and enforceability issues, and intellectual property due diligence. Mr. Spence is an award-winning author and regular speaker on patent law matters, most recently speaking at seminars in China and Taiwan. He earned a J.D. from Washington University Law School and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, magna cum laude, from the University of Missouri.

Kimberly Bullock Gatling, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP
Kim Gatling concentrates her practice in patent and trademark prosecution, licensing, and litigation. Particularly, she prosecutes computer software, business method, and mechanical patent applications as well as trademark applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. She also drafts and negotiates agreements for IT transactions, including software development and maintenance agreements, and advises clients on computer law and Internet issues. Additionally, Ms. Gatling advises clients regarding copyright registration and litigation. She is an active member of the firm’s alcohol and tobacco regulatory teams. Ms. Gatling earned a J.D. from George Washington University Law School and a B.S., cum laude, from North Carolina A&T State University.

This program is CLE-credit eligible.

If you have further questions regarding a specific state or how to file for CLE credit, please contact Bloomberg BNA customer service at 800-372-1033 and ask to speak to the Legal and Business CLE Accreditation Coordinator.

Hardship Policy
Bloomberg BNA offers a hardship policy for any attorney earning less than $30,000 per year. If an attorney wishes to take advantage of this option, he or she must do so in writing and also provide proof of hardship. If approval is granted, a discount of 50% off the full registration price of the program will be awarded.

Questions
For more information about Mandatory or Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) requirements, visit the American Bar Association website at http://www.abanet.org/cle/mandatory.html.