Bloomberg BNA's Pension & Benefits Blog is a special resource offered by Bloomberg BNA to provide commentary and insight on news and trends reported in our publications: Pension & Benefits Daily, Pension & Benefits Reporter, and the Benefits Practice Resource Center. The authors of the blog are members of our Benefits Practice Resource Advisory Board and members of staff (who contribute summaries of some of their recent stories).
The ideas presented here are those of individuals, and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members. We reserve the right not to post comments that are abusive or otherwise objectionable.
Communications regarding the Pension & Benefits Blog may be directed to Dana Domone via e-mail to email@example.com.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Witnesses urged the Department of Labor June 13 to
facilitate the use of annuities as lifetime income options at an ERISA Advisory
Council meeting on examining income replacement for retirees with defined
contribution plans, but stated that fiduciary duties relating to annuities
“Annuities are important because they protect against long
life,” said Olivia S. Mitchell an economist at the Pension Research Council and
Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security at the University of
Pennsylvania's Wharton School in Philadelphia. “Half of people will outlive
their life expectancy,” she said.
Mitchell suggested strategies for maximizing the value of
annuities, including purchasing multiple annuities in different states and
purchasing annuities around age 70.
However, uncertainty about fiduciary duties associated with
annuities may prevent plan sponsors from encouraging plan participants to
purchase them, said Michael L. Hadley, a partner with Davis & Harman in
Concerns exist among plan sponsors “that, in the unlikely
event that an insurer is insolvent, the fiduciaries of the plan that originally
offered that provider's annuity will be liable for not foreseeing the future,”
Hadley said in his written testimony. But he also said that “there's really no
reason that these concerns should exist.”
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act “requires
prudence, not prescience,” Hadley said. “The law is not and should not be
turning plan fiduciaries into stop-loss guarantors,” he said.
to post a comment.
A Possible Alternative to the Moench-ies (Part II)
Attorneys Make Predictions on Fee Litigation, Questions of Constitutional Standing
Battle Over Presumption of Prudence Heats Up Ahead of High Court Arguments
IRS Windsor Retroactivity Guidance Leaves Questions on ERISA Claims, Practitioners Say
Retirement Plans Aren't Required to Apply Windsor Ruling Retroactively, IRS Says