+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Sarah Jane Leake | Bloomberg Law ESMA's guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues – ESMA Consultation Paper ESMA/2012/44 of 30 Jan. 2012 On 30 January, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) launched a consultation seeking views on its proposals for guidelines (Draft Guidelines) on UCITS1 exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and structured UCITS. These proposals have been developed out of feedback to ESMA's discussion paper published last summer.2 The Draft Guidelines are designed to tighten up the regulation applicable to UCITS ETFs and structured UCITS as, in ESMA's view, the existing regulatory regime has failed to keep pace with market developments and, as such, does not give due regard to the specific features and risks associated with these funds. Owing to the investment freedoms given to UCITS under UCITS III3 and the Eligibility Assets Directive,4 UCITS funds started developing new, innovative strategies previously prohibited to them, similar to those employed by the hedge fund industry. In ESMA's view, the inadequacies of the existing regime may have a negative impact on investor protection and market integrity. The Draft Guidelines cover synthetic and physical UCITS ETFs and set out further requirements for UCITS ETFs, index-tracking UCITS (including those employing leverage), efficient portfolio management (EPM) techniques, total return swaps (TRS), and strategy indices for UCITS.
UCITS ETFs— Definitions Although most European ETFs are authorised as UCITS, they have some unique features not present in traditional open-ended funds (e.g., investors do not always receive the fund documentation when they acquire UCITS ETF units directly on-exchange). Despite this, ETFs are frequently confused with other exchange-traded products, such as exchange-traded commodities, as well as with listed closed-end funds. To avoid further confusion, Guidelines include a definition of an UCITS ETF as: ". . . a UCITS at least one unit or share class of which is continuously tradable on at least one regulated market or multilateral trading facility (MTF) with at least one market maker which takes action to ensure that the stock exchange value of its units or shares does not significantly vary from their net asset value."5 This definition is consistent with that set out in the European Commission's MiFIR proposal,6 while at the same time taking into account the unique features of UCITS products. Should the MiFIR definition change substantially during the course of legislative negotiations, this definition will be revised to ensure further alignment between both definitions. Moreover, while stakeholders generally do not see merit in further specifying the type of structure of the ETF in the name,7 ESMA suggests that ETFs should use, at a minimum, the identifier "ETF." UCITS that do not fall within the definition set out above should not therefore use this identifier in their name, fund rules, prospectus, key investor information document (KIID), or any other form of marketing. — Enhanced Transparency for Actively-managed UCITS ETFs While most European-traded ETFs are passively managed, some are actively managed, typically with a view to outperforming an index or other benchmark. Although actively-managed UCITS ETFs use the traditional ETF structure, the composition of the portfolio is left to the manager's discretion. The Draft Guidelines therefore set out a number of disclosure requirements for UCITS ETFs, for example to clearly describe the fund's policy regarding portfolio transparency and where this information may be obtained. — Protecting Investors on Secondary Markets Owing to the diversity of stakeholder opinion as to what level of protection should be afforded to investors trading on the secondary market,8 ESMA asks stakeholders whether it would be sufficient to require the prospectus of all UCITS ETFs to contain an explicit warning to unit-holders that ETF units are generally not redeemable from the fund itself. If not, ESMA asks whether investors acquiring their units or shares on the secondary market should have a right to ask for the redemption of their holding directly from the UCITS ETF at any time, subject to higher redemption fees.
Index-tracking UCITSThe Draft Guidelines set out a number of proposed disclosure requirements for the better protection of investors. Under the proposals, the prospectus of an index-tracking UCITS9 would be required to disclose the following information:
Index-tracking Leveraged UCITSSubject to the restrictions set out in the UCITS Directive (as amended), and its implementing measures (together, the UCITS Framework), index-tracking UCITS may be leveraged. Based on positive feedback last year's discussion paper, ESMA suggests that the prospectus of an index-tracking leveraged UCITS should provide the following details:
Efficient Portfolio Management TechniquesWhile both the UCITS Directive and the Eligible Assets Directive set out rules on the use of certain techniques and instruments for EPM (i.e., sale and repurchase agreements, purchase and resale agreements, and securities lending), ESMA considers it necessary to impose additional requirements on UCITS that use these techniques. The Draft Guidelines set out a number of further disclosures that a UCITS employing EPM techniques should make in its prospectus and annual report. Also of note is the proposed requirement for UCITS to have in place a clear and well-documented haircut policy for each class of assets received as collateral, so that it is clear in which circumstances a specific haircut should or should not be applied to a certain class of assets.
Total Return SwapsIn many cases, UCITS use financial derivatives, typically TRS, to provide investors with a guaranteed payout at the end of a fixed period. In ESMA's view, more and more UCITS are "gaining exposure to complicated investment strategies using TRS" and use "more complex investment strategies which incorporate long/short equity, absolute return, complex macro, arbitrage and commodity strategies through commodity indices only."12 As with UCITS using EPM techniques, ESMA similarly suggests introducing further disclosure requirements for UCITS that use TRS. Moreover, the Draft Guidelines lay down specific standards in relation to collateral in the context of TRS, primarily to ensure that any collateral received is of good quality and is sufficiently diversified.
Strategy IndicesWhere a UCITS gains exposure to a financial index using a financial derivative, it must comply with the rules set out in the UCITS Framework in relation to the construction and publication of the index. In view of the growing number of indices appearing on the market, ESMA believes it is necessary to provide further guidance on the eligibility criteria to qualify as a financial index under the UCITS Directive. This is to ensure that strategy indices13 can be properly defined and treated as financial indices under the Directive. To this end, the Draft Guidelines tighten up the requirements on eligibility. The extensive proposals made in this regard could, however, prove controversial, particularly given that several stakeholders have already expressed concern that the high level of transparency required would "pose a major problem for nearly all index providers."14
Next StepsThe consultation closes for comment on 30 March. All feedback received will be taken into account by ESMA in finalising the guidelines, which are anticipated to be adopted by the Commission before July. DisclaimerThis document and any discussions set forth herein are for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice, which has to be addressed to particular facts and circumstances involved in any given situation. Review or use of the document and any discussions does not create an attorney-client relationship with the author or publisher. To the extent that this document may contain suggested provisions, they will require modification to suit a particular transaction, jurisdiction or situation. Please consult with an attorney with the appropriate level of experience if you have any questions. Any tax information contained in the document or discussions is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code. Any opinions expressed are those of the author. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and its affiliated entities do not take responsibility for the content in this document or discussions and do not make any representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy.©2014 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All rights reserved. Bloomberg Law Reports ® is a registered trademark and service mark of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).