Skip Page Banner  
E-COMMERCE AND TECH LAW
BLOG

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Fourth Circuit Hands Down Important Privacy Decision. Ouch.

RSS

The Fourth Circuit released its opinion this morning in Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, No. 07-1892 (4th Cir. March 18, 2009). Nutshell: Plaintiffs who sue for violations of the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. 2707(a), must prove actual damages in order to qualify for the $1,000 per violation statutory damages provided by the act. Ouch!

In a case involving an employer's intrusion into an employee's personal e-mail account, the court said that the pertinent language in the SCA ("actual damages suffered") was substantially similar to language in the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 522a(g)(4)(A)("actual damages sustained"). The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled, in Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004), that statutory damages are not available under the Privacy Act without proof of actual damages. Ditto for the SCA, the Fourth Circuit decided.

Several courts have previously held that a showing of actual damages is not required to entitled plaintiffs to statutory damages under the SCA. But the Fourth Circuit made short work of these rulings, stating that they were at odds with the teaching of Doe v. Chao.

Subscription RequiredAll BNA publications are subscription-based and require an account. If you are a subscriber to the BNA publication and signed-in, you will automatically have access to the story. If you are not a subscriber, you will need to sign-up for a trial subscription.

You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.

Comments (0)