Bloomberg BNA’s Premier International Tax Library is a comprehensive global tax resource. Trust Bloomberg BNA's Premier International Tax Library for the guidance you need on...
By Joe Kirwin
Oct. 3 — France's patent box legislation, which permits a 15 percent corporate tax rate for profits from licensing of intellectual property rights rather than the usual 35 percent corporate tax rate, is being challenged as unfair to the European Union single market.
The matter has come before the EU Code of Conduct Group for Business Taxation, where several EU countries—including Ireland, Bulgaria and the Baltic nations— are insisting the French patent box regime should be considered harmful.
Among those contesting France's IP rate are EU member countries that were themselves previously criticized by France over their overall low corporate tax rates.
“The issue has surfaced because France insists its regime doesn't need to be reformed as all EU member states agreed to do in 2014,” a European Union diplomat, who participates in the Code of Conduct Group of Business Taxation, told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 30.
“However, all other EU countries are reforming their tax regime and insist France must do the same. Some of these countries, many of them resentful over French criticism of tax dumping, are rejecting the French arguments against reform.”
France defended its patent box law at a meeting of the conduct group Sept. 23, insisting the reduced tax rate of 15 percent shouldn't be considered harmful in light of the varying level of corporate tax rates among other EU member countries, and because the scheme hasn't attracted foreign investment.
In a document submitted to the Conduct group and seen by Bloomberg BNA, the French government said: “Even if this rate is lower than half the French general tax rate, it can not be a relevant feature to consider an IP regime as potentially harmful. Levels of corporate tax have been substantially reduced since then in many EU countries. Given this, the French IP regime tax rate of 15 percent can not affect in a significant way the location of business activities.”
France also insisted in the document that “136 taxpayers benefit from the regime.”
“The total expenditure of the IP regime is estimated to be 245 million euro ($274.4) in 2014. Specifically, it is a fact that mainly French companies benefit from this regime. The data shows that the regime is not attractive to foreign companies.
“They do not tend to locate their patent activity in France,” the French government stated, adding that this is a “robust” indication that the French IP regime has no harmful effect.
The challenge to the French IP regime comes as the European Green Party and other political groups in the European Parliament are pressuring the European Commission to come to a decision over the regulation of patent box regimes. Currently, 12 EU member countries have patent box tax regimes.
EU finance ministers agreed in 2014 that all EU patent box regimes must be reformed to comply with the modified nexus regime after the commission threatened to challenge some of the schemes with an illegal state aid probe.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's base erosion and profiting shifting reforms also call for compliance with the modified nexus approach.
“It has been brought to our attention that several countries are delayed in the implementation of the modified nexus approach,” said the European Green Party in a letter, a copy of which was seen by Bloomberg BNA.
“Furthermore, despite a general commitment in 2014 to do so, France now claims that it will not rollback its patent box scheme.”
A European Commission official told Bloomberg BNA that it is still assessing whether the 12 EU member countries with patent box regimes are adapting sufficient reforms to comply with the modified nexus approach, which basically only allows a nation to adopt tax reductions on profits generated from patents derived from research and development that occurred within the country. Many countries have adopted patent boxes in an effort to attract high-tech enterprises.
“There has been progress, so at this point we are optimistic that by 2019, sufficient changes will have been adopted,” the European Commission official told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 30 on condition of anonymity.
The debate over the French patent box tax plan has triggered varying viewpoints among lawyers and experts.
“The patent box regime by France is another example of an incentive to race to the bottom in corporate tax rates,” Tommaso Faccio, a professor of tax law at the University of Nottingham, told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 30 in an e-mail statement.
“It is hypocritical of France to introduce it after having complained for years about unfair tax competition.”
Romain Pichot, a tax lawyer based in Paris, told Bloomberg BNA the French patent box regime was “defensive.”
“It does not help to attract non-French based companies but it helps to retain certain French-based companies in France,” Picton told Bloomberg BNA in an Sept. 29 email statement. “It should be viewed as a tool to retain research and development in France. ”
He added that it was unfair for other member states to criticize the French regime over the reduced corporate tax regime because many of them have “built their economy on tax competition with their neighbor.”
The Code of Conduct Group is expected to revisit the mater in November.
To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Kirwin in Brussels at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Penny Sukhraj at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)