Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

Gillette & The Future of Income Tax Apportionment

Gillette & The Future of Income Tax Apportionment
Product Code - TMW50
Speaker(s): Kendall Houghton, Alston & Bird; Matthew Hedstrom, Alston & Bird; Jeffrey Reed, Mayer Brown
Buy Now

 Gillette has sent shockwaves through the state tax community. Unexpectedly, a California Court of Appeal ruled that a taxpayer could elect to file income tax returns using UDITPA’s three-factor apportionment rather than California statutory apportionment because California signed the Multistate Tax Compact, which provides for optional apportionment using UDITPA. The court’s decision has nationwide ramifications and likely impacts most multistate businesses.

The decision also raises a host of interesting questions. Perhaps most obviously, what will happen next in California? California has repealed its membership in the Multistate Tax Compact and has signed retroactive legislation designed to bar taxpayers from filing refund claims electing to use UDITPA apportionment. Moreover, the California FTB is likely to appeal the decision to the California Supreme Court. Accordingly, the war may be far from over in California.

What impact will Gillette will have in other states? Nineteen jurisdictions are currently full members of the Multistate Tax Compact. Litigation could potentially ensue in those jurisdictions on the same issue (if it has not already).

From a tax planning perspective, a question is how aggressively to read Gillette. In Gillette, the taxpayer sought three-factor apportionment, but there may be other reasons for taxpayers to seek to take advantage of UDITPA apportionment and allocation besides wanting to take advantage of UDITPA’s three-factor apportionment formula.
An upcoming webinar will explore these and other questions.

Upon completion of this program, participants will know:

  • The history of the Multistate Tax Compact and why states decided to sign it;
  • The Gillette litigation and the main arguments raised by Gillette and the FTB;
  • What California SB 1015 was designed to do and whether there are arguments that it does not achieve these objectives;
  • Litigation and administrative rulings on the Gillette issue in other states;
  • Several potential advantages/opportunities of being able to elect to file corporate income tax returns using UDITPA’s apportionment and allocation scheme;
  • Several potential advantages and disadvantages of filing refund claims in different states in response to Gillette; and
  • The potential review of the Gillette decision by the United States Supreme Court.

Kendall Houghton, Alston & Bird; Matthew Hedstrom, Alston & Bird; Jeffrey Reed, Mayer Brown

 Kendall Houghton, Counsel, Alston & Bird LLP, has for two decades been a nationally recognized expert whose practice focuses on state and local tax planning, tax controversies and various legal matters related to unclaimed property/escheat. She previously served as general counsel to the Council On State Taxation (COST), where she filed numerous U.S. Supreme Court briefs in cases impacting state taxation of multistate commerce, and she led a tax policy initiative addressing taxation of Internet transactions. Ms. Houghton has successfully represented clients on a multi-jurisdictional basis with respect to significant tax disputes; negotiated favorable settlements with numerous state and local jurisdictions; developed and advocated state tax policy and legislative positions that benefited client interests; and collaborated with clients to design transactional and organizational structures that have optimized direct and indirect tax burdens. Ms. Houghton also advises clients with respect to unclaimed property/escheat compliance, voluntary disclosure initiatives, planning opportunities, single- and multistate audit defense, and litigation of state unclaimed property assessments.

Ms. Houghton is co-author of Bloomberg BNA’s Multistate Tax Management portfolio entitled “Unclaimed Property.” She is a Georgetown University School of Law instructor (LL.M. program). Ms. Houghton is a featured speaker at national state tax conferences and schools hosted by COST, TEI and IPT.

Matthew Hedstrom is a senior associate in the State & Local Tax Group at Alston & Bird LLP. He focuses his practice on state and local tax planning and controversy and addresses clients’ multistate tax issues, including state income tax apportionment, tax base, business/nonbusiness income determinations, telecommunications and sales/use tax nexus, sourcing and taxability issues. Matthew also advises clients on the state and local tax implications of restructuring, mergers, acquisitions and dispositions. Matthew has tax controversy experience at the audit, administrative and appeals level in several jurisdictions.

Matthew also assists clients on unclaimed property matters, including multistate compliance, voluntary disclosure, planning, audit defense and legal opinions.

Matthew is a member and on the executive board of the State and Local Tax Committee of the American Bar Association’s Tax Section. He also regularly speaks and publishes on a wide variety of state tax topics.

Jeffrey S. Reed
, Associate, Mayer Brown LLP, focuses his practice on state and local taxation. Jeff assists businesses and individuals in audits and state tax litigation before courts and administrative bodies throughout the United States. He has represented clients in state tax controversy matters in over 30 state and local tax jurisdictions. He also provides advice with respect to the potential state and local tax consequences of complex transactions.

Jeff has written extensively in the area of state and local taxation. His articles have been published in a variety of different journals, including State Tax Notes, Bloomberg BNA’s Multistate Tax Report, Corporate Counsel, the American Bar Association’s State and Local Tax Lawyer, Inside New York Taxes, Private Wealth, the Journal of Taxation and Regulation of Financial Institutions, E-Commerce Times, and Legal Times. Jeff is an active member of the New York State Bar Association, and is the principal author of the Tax Section’s Report #1171: Repeal of the Temporary Stay Exception.

A regular lecturer on state and local tax matters, Jeff has spoken before organizations such as the Broadband Tax Institute, the Council on State Taxation (COST), the Tax Executives Institute (TEI), the Institute for Professionals in Taxation, Lorman Educational Seminars, and New York University’s Summer Institute in State and Local Taxation.

Up to 1.5 CPE / CLE Credits depending on actual program length