The Labor & Employment Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
by Laura D. Francis
The Senate Judiciary Committee May 9 began what will likely be a long process of marking up the proposed Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act (S. 744), considering that more than 300 amendments have been offered.
One of the amendments adopted May 9 includes a substitute bill from the original sponsors, the so-called “gang of eight,” bringing what had been an 844-page bill to 867 pages. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), one of the gang of eight’s leaders, said during the markup that the changes were minor—although Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) disputed that claim.
The first session concluded after consideration of 32 amendments, 21 of which were adopted.
At the first day of the markup senators focused mainly on border security, which has been a point of contention among some of the Republican committee members, especially committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). Grassley repeatedly has expressed concern that the bill would repeat the mistakes of the last immigration overhaul legislation that was passed in 1986. Grassley has offered 77 amendments to the bill—so far five have been adopted by voice vote and one voted down 6-12.
The markup also involved a dispute over Sessions’ concerns that the bill would wind up harming American workers at a time when so many are unemployed. Schumer argued that doing nothing would be worse because undocumented immigrants already are working—the bill would bring them under the protection of U.S. labor laws so that employers can’t exploit them as a cheap source of labor rather than hiring Americans to perform the work.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), another gang of eight member, added that the bill would protect American workers from being displaced by foreign guestworkers. He also insisted that the bill would control the “jobs magnet” for undocumented immigrants coming into the United States by making the E-Verify electronic employment eligibility verification system mandatory for all employers.
Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has set aside May 14, 16, and 20 for more consideration, and it appears likely that the time will be used, and perhaps more, despite the committee’s fairly rapid pace. Three hundred amendments is a lot to get through.
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
EEO Roundup: Obesity as a Disability—EEOC’s Feldblum Comments
Public Sector Roundup: Administration Told to Insist on Back Pay for Federal Workers If Shutdown Occurs
Public Sector Roundup: Proposed Rule Would Allow Compensatory Time Off for Religious Observances
Q&A: U.S. Multinationals Must Understand Local EEO Issues
Q&A: A Glimpse Into Defending Workers’ Discrimination Claims