The Bloomberg BNA SALT Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues about state and local tax topics. The ideas presented here are those of individuals and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
by Kathleen Caggiano
An increasing number of states are enacting tax incentives designed to allow certain students to enroll in private schools. Most of these incentives are targeted towards low-income students currently enrolled in underperforming schools. Why the sudden surge in this type of incentive? “Recovering state revenues are fueling the growth of such programs,” reports a Stateline article. “Some 23 states and the District of Columbia now have some kind of program to support private education with state dollars,” notes the article, based on numbers provided by the Friedman Foundation. However, these tax incentives are often the subject of debate because it is argued that public funds should not be used for religious schools. The Strafford Superior Court in New Hampshire recently ruled that the state’s education tax credit program was unconstitutional. The credit, which is given to businesses donating to scholarship organizations, violated the no-aid clause of the state constitution by allowing the scholarship funds to be applied toward tuition at religious schools, reports a Bloomberg BNA Weekly State Tax Report article. Nonetheless, states continue to enact these types of credits. For example, Alabama recently enacted two new tax credits – the failing schools credit and the scholarship organization contribution credit. The failing schools credit is a refundable credit for the parents of a student enrolled in, or assigned to attend, a failing school and is for the cost of transferring the student to a nonfailing public school or private school of the parents’ choice. As a complementary incentive, Alabama offers a tax credit for contributions to a scholarship-granting organization. The credit equals the total contributions made to a scholarship-granting organization during the taxable year for which the credit is claimed, up to 50 percent of the taxpayer's tax liability. In order to offset the expected loss of revenue to the state as a result of offering these two tax credits, Alabama set aside $40 million, the Stateline article notes. For more information about the various school tax credits and incentives, check out Bloomberg BNA’s Credits and Incentives Portfolios. In other developments . . . The South Carolina Supreme Court recently ruled that Centex Homes is not eligible to claim more than $5 million in tax credits for investing in infrastructure projects because it is a partnership, according to a Bloomberg BNA Weekly State Tax Report article by Andrew M. Ballard.
By: Kathleen Caggiano
Follow us on Twitter at: @BBNATax.Join Bloomberg BNA's State Tax Group on LinkedIn.
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
COST Report Slams Delaware, Praises Massachusetts and Virginia for Unclaimed Property Policies
Sales Tax Slice: Will the U.S. Supreme Court Hear New York’s Amazon Case?
Incentives Watch: States Offer Incentives to Encourage Taxpayers to “Plug-In” to Electric Vehicles
Weekly Round-Up: Hotel Occupancy Tax Dispute Heats Up
State Tax Snapshot: Runner-Up to Toilet Seat Museum Gets Property Tax Exemption in Nebraska