Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

Iowa League of Cities v. EPA: The Decision and Implications


Product Code - EHAU03
Speaker(s): Nathan Gardner-Andrews, General Counsel for the National Association of Clean Water Agencies, Gary B. Cohen, Special Counsel with Hall & Associates, and John Hall, Founder of Hall & Associates
Add To Cart
In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit thoroughly renounced the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempts to revise, by using guidance letters instead of formal rulemaking procedures, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System rules to limit wet weather treatment options (i.e., the use of blending) and prevent the use of bacteria mixing zones when permitting NPDES discharges (Iowa League of Cities v. EPA, 711 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2013)). The court also concluded that a blending prohibition was beyond EPA’s statutory authority. The Iowa League decision represents a major victory for municipal interests across the country. By EPA’s own estimate, the blending ban alone imposed over $150 billion in costs nationwide. The costs associated with a bacteria mixing zone ban was never estimated. However, one Midwest state official observed a federal bacteria mixing zone prohibition would have put every stormwater discharger in their state in noncompliance with no reasonable way to ever meet the permit limitations.

This webinar will reflect on the events leading up to the filing of the case, the evolution of EPA’s guidance on these issues, and the Eight Circuit’s decision. It also will look at what the decision means for the regulated community and more broadly, the implications on an agency’s ability to usurp rulemaking procedures to impose binding requirements on the regulated community.

This Bloomberg BNA webinar is designed to:
•Explain blending and bacteria mixing zones and why municipalities want to utilize such strategies
•Provide background on the applicable Clean Water Act provisions and regulations
•Review EPA’s previous guidance and summarize the decade-long litigation filed on these issues
•Analyze the court decision, the vacated bacteria mixing zone and blending prohibitions, and the impact on the regulated community as well as future wet weather programs
•Discuss EPA guidance, letters, and informal approaches that circumvent the formal rulemaking process

Register easily and securely to reserve your space now for Bloomberg BNA's upcoming EHS Webinar and get a $75 discount as a BNA subscriber! Or, call 800-372-1033, menu Option 6, submenu Option 1, and refer to the date and title of this conference. Lines are open from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. ET, excluding most federal holidays.

Don’t miss this opportunity to hear a lively, dynamic presentation. Not only are EHS Webinars an excellent way for you to stay current, with Bloomberg BNA you also get:
Quality. Count on it. Nothing is canned.
Objectivity. BNA provides you with the best and most objective information. Unlike other companies, we don’t use our Webinars as a forum to sell outside solutions.
Affordability. EHS Webinars are inexpensive compared to the cost of travel to attend a conference. Plus, you may use a speakerphone and invite as many of your colleagues as you want to listen in—all for the price of a single registration.
Convenience. No airlines. No travel. No time out of the office.

In addition, you’ll receive:
Personal attention. Once you’ve registered, send your questions in advance to annebrown@bna.com and they’ll be included in the program. You’ll also have a chance to ask your questions during the Webinar.
Follow-up materials. You need no materials upfront to follow along to our live conference. But BNA always issues a follow-up e-mail with contact information for our speakers as well as other materials related to the topic.
CLE credits will be available for this EHS Webinar.

Nathan Gardner-Andrews, General Counsel for the National Association of Clean Water Agencies, Gary B. Cohen, Special Counsel with Hall & Associates, and John Hall, Founder of Hall & Associates


Nathanandrews
Nathan Gardner-Andrews is general counsel for the National Association of Clean Water Agencies. He advises NACWA and its members on legal, regulatory, legislative, and policy matters and oversees the Association’s litigation portfolio. Nathan has written articles and spoken nationally on clean water issues. He received his B.A. from Columbia University, and a law degree from the University of Maryland School of Law. Nathan is licensed to practice in the District of Columbia and Maryland.

GaryCohen
Gary B. Cohen is special counsel with Hall & Associates. With 30 years of environmental law experience, he represents clients throughout the country on Clean Water Act-related issues including National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit negotiation, NPDES permit appeals, defense of enforcement actions, pretreatment program review and development, multijurisdictional agreements, industrial user contracts, development of enforcement response plans, and development of permits for industrial users. In addition, his expertise includes NPDES and pretreatment litigation defense, regulatory counseling, Section 404 wetlands permitting, underground injection, solid waste and sludge regulation, facility siting and hazardous waste counseling and litigation. Gary is a member of the California, District of Columbia, and New York bar associations.

JohnHall
John Hall is the founder of Hall & Associates. His practice specializes in the resolution of complex water, air, and hazardous waste issues through application of state of the art scientific analysis, legal advocacy, and innovative regulatory implementation. John is a nationally recognized expert on water quality criteria and standards, NPDES permitting, compliance issues, and coalition building. He has been a persistent advocate for common sense and cost-effective environmental regulation and has written more than 100 articles, many published in peer-reviewed journals. John is a member of the District of Columbia and Virginia bars, and is admitted to practice before various appellate courts.