Bloomberg BNA's Pension & Benefits Blog is a special resource offered by Bloomberg BNA to provide commentary and insight on news and trends reported in our publications: Pension & Benefits Daily, Pension & Benefits Reporter, and the Benefits Practice Resource Center. The authors of the blog are members of our Pension & Benefits Publications Advisory Board and members of staff (who contribute summaries of some of their recent stories).
The ideas presented here are those of individuals, and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members. We reserve the right not to post comments that are abusive or otherwise objectionable.
Communications regarding the Pension & Benefits Blog may be directed to Dana Domone via e-mail to ddomone@bna.com.
Friday, April 19, 2013
by Florence Olsen
For more than a decade, the Internal Revenue Service has been refining its approach to examining tax-qualified retirement plans, most recently by focusing on internal controls, according to BNA interviews with attorneys and auditors who help employers maintain their plans’ tax-qualified status.
Internal controls are the documented practices and procedures that prevent errors from occurring or that quickly flag errors before the errors have large financial consequences. IRS recognizes their role in keeping plans compliant with the dozens of tax code rules that apply to plan sponsors.
‘‘Clearly IRS has moved to the forefront their focus on specific and tangible internal controls, and that means they look for proof or evidence of actual checks and balances,’’ Thomas G. Schendt, a partner at Alston & Bird in Washington, told BNA.
Practitioners need to understand that, ‘‘as the emphasis on internal controls is being implemented by IRS, so follows the emphasis on proof or retention of records and documents that prove the internal controls have been implemented,’’ Schendt said.
For example, if a plan administrator says in response to an agency query that a third party administrator was responsible for sending out safe harbor notices three years ago, the plan administrator must be able to prove that the notices were sent out, he said.
‘‘It is not just about having internal controls but about proof that they have been implemented,’’ Schendt said. Certain notices, enrollment kits, election forms, and other disclosure information should be retained as evidence for when IRS asks for proof of internal controls, he said.
Click here for full text of the report.
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Fiduciary Rule May Not Appear Until Spring, 408(b)(2) Guide Out Soon, Attorneys Say
ERISA Advisory Council to Recommend Updated Guidance On Finding Lost, Missing Plan Participants
Groups Say Lifetime Income Guidance Should Be Flexible, Provide Protections
Guidance Provides Administrative Relief On Spousal Benefit Issues, Practitioners Say
Should Employers Pay or Play? Podcast by Littler Mendelson Attorneys Steven Friedman and Ilyse Schuman