Skip Page Banner  
    About This Blog

     

    The Social Media Law Blog is a forum for lawyers, compliance personnel, human resources managers, and other professionals who are struggling with the legal implications of social media across a broad variety of topics. Working professionals and Bloomberg BNA editors may share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues to build a community of knowledge on this rapidly evolving topic. The ideas presented here are those of individuals, and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.


     

     

    SOCIAL MEDIA LAW
    BLOG

    Wednesday, July 18, 2012

    Law Requires FDA Guidance on Social Media

    RSS

    A customer loads Pfizer's Facebook page and leaves a comment on a wall post asking about an off-label use of one the company's products. How should the pharmaceutical company respond, if at all?

    That issue is one of the many topics to be addressed in guidance the Food and Drug Administration is required to issue within two years.

    Section 1121 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (S. 3187), signed into law by President Obama on July 9, tasks the agency with issuing guidance on its policy "regarding the promotion, using the Internet (including social media), of medical products that are regulated by such Administration."

    Areta L. Kupchyk, a partner with Nixon Peabody LLP in Washington, told BNA that the forthcoming guidance "is essential." The developing social media and internet media are "different from broadcast and print. They reach a global audience, can exist indefinitely, . . . [and are] an active dialogue between people."

    Kupchyk said she believed the most contentious issue will be how companies should respond to off-label questions posed on social media platforms. "Almost everyone" objected to the FDA's stance in a December 2011 draft guidance that companies respond privately to any question on social media that addressed off-label uses, she added.

    The FDA had noted that it may be true "that the original, unsolicited off-label question may have been available to a very broad audience." Nonetheless, "the firm should not make its detailed response with off-label information publicly available within the same forum."

    The issue is important because federal law only permits companies from promoting a drug or medical device for uses that have received FDA clearance. The FDA also has not been hesitant to issue warning letters to companies it believes have engaged in improper off-label communications through social media.

    Copyright 2012, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.

     

    Subscription RequiredAll BNA publications are subscription-based and require an account. If you are a subscriber to the BNA publication and signed-in, you will automatically have access to the story. If you are not a subscriber, you will need to sign-up for a trial subscription.

    You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.

    Comments (0)