+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Andrea J. Chiller | Bloomberg Law Bell v. Village of Streamwood, No. 10-cv-03263, 2011 BL 209990 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2011) Ronald Bell claimed that Village of Streamwood police officer James Mandarino used excessive force against him during a traffic stop and filed a civil rights action against Mandarino, Streamwood, and several others under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. During the course of discovery, plaintiffs took the deposition of Ryan Ruthenberg, Mandarino's union representative. Ruthenberg refused to answer many of the questions, asserting that the information was protected from disclosure under the Illinois state law-based union agent privilege. Following the deposition, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel his testimony. As the Court noted, the motion "raise[d] a question of first impression regarding whether an employee-union representative privilege should be adopted as a matter of federal common law in connection with a federal civil rights lawsuit." When an action arises under federal law, as with the instant case, questions of privilege are governed by federal common law. Where federal law has not yet recognized a particular state law privilege, the court must determine whether the federal common law should be expanded to recognize it. The Court found that "[t]he nature of a union agent's role suggests a need to protect some communications between union agents and union members." In the context of disciplinary hearings, union representatives serve several roles, many of which are not unlike those of an attorney, such as representing the union member during hearings and investigations. During the course of this relationship, union members will often disclose confidential information to the representative. The Court found the union members' expectation of confidentiality to be critical, observing that they would be less likely to fully disclose all necessary information to their representatives if it could later be subject to discovery, which would impede the representatives' ability to fully advise and represent the union members. Accordingly, the Court held that an employee-union representative privilege exists under federal common law when the communications are "made (1) in confidence; (2) in connection with 'representative' services relating to anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings; (3) between an employee and his union representative; (4) where the union representative is acting in his or her official representative capacity."
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).