The Occupational Safety & Health Reporter™ provides complete news coverage and documentation of federal and state occupational safety and health programs, standards, legislation, regulations, enforcement, and Review Commission decisions.
Following several months of discussions, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has updated the factors it uses to measure how effectively states enforce workplace safety and health regulations.
The new list places more emphasis on how fast states respond to and investigate complaints, how they assess penalties, and whether workers accompanied compliance officers during inspections.
The changes to the “state activity mandate measures” were announced in an Oct. 11 memorandum from David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health, and took effect Oct. 1. They will be used starting with the quarterly reviews for fiscal 2013.
The measurements are:
• planned versus actual inspections;
• percent of inspections in the public sector;
• percent of inspections where establishments were found in compliance;
• average number of violations per inspection;
• average current serious penalty, with a breakout by total and size of employer;
• percent of high-hazard establishments inspected;
• percent of penalty retained after reductions;
• percent of fatalities responded to within one day;
• number of open, noncontested cases with incomplete abatement more than 60 days after citations were issued;
• average number days between an inspection's opening conference and issuing citations;
• average number of work days to initiate complaint investigations;
• average number of work days to initiate complaint inspections;
• percent of imminent danger complaints and referrals responded to within one work day;
• number of inspections where entry was denied and entry was not obtained;
• percent of safety whistleblower investigations completed within 90 calender days;
• average number of calender days to complete a safety whistleblower investigation;
• percent of safety whistleblower complaints determined to have merit; and
• percent of initial inspections with employee representation during the walk-around by inspectors or employee interviews.
When judging how states are performing, OSHA reviewers will compare the results with federal OSHA's results and expectations. For example, OSHA expects all fatalities to be responded to within one work day. Also, a state's average number of violations per inspection should be within plus or minus 20 percent of the federal average for the past three years.
The 18 new measurements replace a list of 15 data points OSHA used for previous state reviews. The new lists places more emphasis on how fast states respond to and investigate complaints, assess penalties, and whether workers accompanied compliance officers during inspections.
All the measures were discussed at a June 25 public meeting in OSHA's Washington, D.C., headquarters or in written comments submitted to OSHA (42 OSHR 735, 8/16/12).
The measures were also discussed during gatherings of a panel of OSHA and state plan officials, known as the At Least as Effective Workgroup.
Issuing the new criteria does not end discussions between OSHA and states on measures for determining overall state plan effectiveness, Butch Tongate, chairman of the Occupational Safety and Health State Plan Association and deputy secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department, told BNA Oct. 16.
Still on the agenda for the states and OSHA are talks focused on handling whistleblower cases and consultations for employers seeking advice.
“I expect the discussions to start in earnest early next year,” Tongate said.
In the interim, the states and OSHA will be training their staffs on the new criteria and preparing for a new review cycle that calls for the detailed “federal annual monitoring evaluation” reports to be done every other year instead of annually, Tongate said.
In response to OSHA's recently issued reports on the 27 states and territories with their own safety programs, several states objected to OSHA conclusions. (See related story.)
Michaels's memo is available at http://op.bna.com/env.nsf/r?Open=sbra-8z5sxj.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)