Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

New gTLDs: Action Points in the Post-Application Period


Product Code - LGAU42
Speaker(s): Flip Petillion, Crowell & Moring LLP; John L. Murino, Crowell & Moring LLP; Jan Janssen, Crowell & Moring LLP
Add To Cart
Everyone is familiar with gTLDs (generic top level domains) such as “.com,” “.edu” and “.gov.” This summer, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) offered an unprecedented opportunity for organizations to apply for new gTLDs and published the list of proposed names on June 13. Now that the applications are in, for the next seven months applicants will be able to defend their applications and question the applications of others.

Interested parties who have not submitted applications will be able to take action against pending ones. What if a pending name encroaches on someone else's trademark? Alternative dispute resolution procedures have been established in order to obtain efficient, reasoned decisions at a manageable cost. Our faculty will provide commentary and analysis of these procedures.

Educational Objectives:

• Learn about the recent ICANN developments so you may better advise your business and Internet-savvy clients.
• Understand the implications for trademark holders.
• Find out about the public comment and objection processes.
• Understand the established procedures for dispute resolution.

Who would benefit from attending this program?

Intellectual property attorneys; attorneys who advise those engaged in online business transactions; judges; gTLD applicants; trademark holders.

Program Level: Advanced

Credit Available: CLE. For more information, please click on the “CLE Credit” tab.

For background information and more information about the gTLD application process, the program ICANN's gTLD Expansion: The Applications Are (Almost All) In – Now What?, which took place during the process, is available in an OnDemand format.

Flip Petillion, Crowell & Moring LLP; John L. Murino, Crowell & Moring LLP; Jan Janssen, Crowell & Moring LLP

Flip Petillion, Crowell & Moring LLP
Flip Petillion is a partner in the firm's Brussels office. He is co-chair of the firm’s TLD and Domain Name practice. His practice has been devoted to IP, IT, Media and Communication for almost 25 years, with a heavy emphasis on IP litigation and counseling for corporate clients in industries such as hardware and software developers, film producers and distributors, advertising agencies, architects, authors and performers, financial institutions, insurance companies, automotive businesses, and diamond traders.

Flip is a well recognized arbitrator and panelist with the World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland, which is a specialized agency of the United Nations. He also serves as an arbitrator and panelist with the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) and Belgian’s Arbitration and Mediation Center (CEPANI). Flip’s experience in the area of Internet governance and domain names includes a wide range of major matters, such as representing different “gTLDs“ and “ccTlds” on contractual and policy-related issues. Flip has been assisting near to 100 large brand owners in developing both proactive and defensive strategies towards ICANN’s New gTLD Program. Flip is part of WIPO’s roster of panelists available for appointment under the Legal Rights Objection (LRO) procedure to be administered by the WIPO Center as of June 2012.

John L. Murino, Crowell & Moring LLP
John L. Murino is a counsel in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, where he practices in the International Dispute Resolution and Intellectual Property groups. John’s practice primarily involves complex civil litigation and international arbitration representing clients in a variety of industries including technology, media, software, securities, mining and manufacturing. He also is active in counseling clients regarding various Internet governance, intellectual property rights, and international business related issues.

John’s recent counseling experience includes advising Internet registry service providers on various issues related to corporate organization, policy implementation, and contract compliance and monitoring; advising corporations in their efforts to apply for, secure, and operate top level domains; and advising corporations with their online intellectual property rights strategies and challenges. John's recent arbitration and litigation experience includes representing an Internet registry services company in a dispute under the ICC Rules of Arbitration against ICANN, arising out of a breach of contract claim involving the sTLD <.jobs>; and representing an Internet registry services company in a dispute under the ICDR International Arbitration Rules against ICANN arising out of ICANN’s improper
refusal to award the sTLD <.xxx>.

Jan Janssen, Crowell & Moring LLP
Jan Janssen is an associate at the Brussels office of Crowell & Moring since 2008. Jan's legal practice focuses on IP and IT. Jan practices in national and international dispute resolution with a special focus on intellectual property and information technology.

Jan’s practice primarily involves complex litigation, (international) arbitrations in a variety of industries including fashion, media, postal services, technology and telecommunications. Jan also provides contractual advice and assists clients in protecting, managing and enforcing their intellectual property rights, including in transactional matters, such as distribution, agency, licensing, technology transfer, software development, outsourcing and service level agreements. Jan has been involved in the assistance of various large brand owners in developing both proactive and defensive strategies towards ICANN’s New gTLD Program. He also has ample experience in trademark and domain name litigation, including UDRP proceedings with WIPO, NAF, CAC and CEPANI. Jan is fluent in English, French and Dutch.

This program is CLE-credit eligible.

If you have further questions regarding a specific state or how to file for CLE credit, please contact Bloomberg BNA customer service at 800-372-1033 and ask to speak to the Legal and Business CLE Accreditation Coordinator.

Hardship Policy
Bloomberg BNA offers a hardship policy for any attorney earning less than $30,000 per year. If an attorney wishes to take advantage of this option, he or she must do so in writing and also provide proof of hardship. If approval is granted, a discount of 50% off the full registration price of the program will be awarded.

Questions
For more information about Mandatory or Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) requirements, visit the American Bar Association website at http://www.abanet.org/cle/mandatory.html.