Judge Burton Lifland said that the language and framework of the Securities Investor Protection Act and other factors support trustee Irving Picard’s unadjusted net investment method for determining the net equity claims of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC’ customers. Under this method net equity claims of BLMIS customers would be calculated based upon the monies that the customers deposited in their BLMIS accounts, less any amounts they withdrew.
The court said that choosing any method for calculating net equity is especially challenging given the complex and unique facts of Madoff’s scheme. This ruling provides a distribution formula that impacts not only the extent of the entitlements of each BLMIS claimholder to the limited customer property fund and when the $1.4 billion cash reserve will be released.
The court said that certain objecting claimants, consisting of both individuals who withdrew more than they deposited with BLMIS--net winners--as well as ones who withdrew less--net losers--seek time-based damages for the period of time during which their funds were deposited with BLMIS.
Specifically, the court said, certain objecting claimants seek interest-based adjustments to their net equity claim based on claims against BLMIS for federal securities fraud which entitle them to prejudgment interest; state law claims against BLMIS for conversion, which entitle them to prejudgment interest of 9 percent under New York law, and general claims for lost investment opportunities over time. Others, the court said, seek inflation-based adjustments to their net equity claims in reliance on the precept that the value of the dollar changes over time.
This position is not entitled to deference under either Chevron or Skidmore, the court said (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984); Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944).
In other specifics, the court said that the inclusion of time-based damages would eliminate the market risks that are inherent in securities and additional market-based investment vehicles. This would result in an outcome that the objecting claimants never bargained for and SIPA never intended to protect, the court said.
In sum, the court upheld the trustee’s determination that net equity should be based on the trustee’s net investment method, without any adjustments or enhancements for time-based damages.
To see the opinion, go to http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/SECURITIES_INVESTOR_PROTECTION_CORPORATION_Plaintiff_v_BERNARD_L_.
To view additional stories from Bloomberg Law® request a demo now