Bloomberg Law: Privacy & Data Security brings you single-source access to the expertise of Bloomberg Law’s privacy and data security editorial team, contributing practitioners,...
By Marcus Hoy
April 18 — The Norwegian Data Protection Authority recently said it will require companies to notify individuals whose personal data has been disclosed without their consent.
DPA Senior Adviser Eirin Oda Lauvset told Bloomberg BNA April 18 that Norwegian laws don't specify a general right for data subjects to be informed of breaches. According to the DPA, the new practice stemmed from cases heard by the nation's Privacy Appeals Board (PVN)—the appeals body for DPA decisions.
Norway's Personal Data Regulation provides that a controller who discovers that confidential personal information has been disclosed to unauthorized persons shall notify the DPA, Lauvset said. Meanwhile, the country's Personal Data Act states that the data subject shall be provided with information concerning possible disclosure of personal information, as well as the identity of the recipient.
“Neither of the provisions alone provides the data subject with a clear right to be informed if his or her information has been disclosed to someone who is unauthorized,” Lauvset said
The PVN had found in multiple cases that a data controller has a duty to notify the affected persons, either individually or collectively. In its interpretation of existing law, the PVN concluded that the DPA is justified in imposing notification requirements on companies and other organizations. According to the PVN, individuals have a fundamental right know who is able to process and store their personal data and how this occurs.
The new practice, the DPA said, means that it can require data controllers to inform those concerned in the event of a breach.
The cases handled by the PVN concerned unauthorized disclosure of personal health data—some cases only involved patients' identification numbers or their weight. However, the PVN determined that notification to affected parties shouldn't only be determined by an assessment of whether the information can be misused or whether the person being notified could take any action to prevent misuse. Furthermore, the PVN's decisions also implied that the economic consequences of disclosure needn't be considered when notification obligations are imposed on the data controller.
While the tribunal cases concerned personal health information, Lauvset said, the scope of those decisions extended further. “Firstly, the PVN said that to be informed of what happens to one's personal data, who gets handle and store it and how this occurs, is a fundamental privacy right” she said. “This should apply regardless of whether the information is health-related or other personal information. Secondly, the PVN said that it was not the specific information that was leaked that was deemed the most worthy of protection in these cases, rather, it was what could be deduced from the information,” Lauvset said.
“We believe that the tribunal's opinions in these cases are relevant as they can have a bearing in many types of contexts, which can make the overall data deserving of protection,” she said
The new practice would apply in cases of leaked personal information that can potentially be linked to individuals, Lauvset said. However, she added that the obligation wouldn't extend to leaks of fully anonymised data, which falls outside the scope of Norwegian data protection law.
“In some cases it will be take time before businesses of receive an order to inform those affected” the DPA said. “During this period, organizations should themselves judge whether they wish to inform individuals on their own initiative or wait until they are ordered to do so.” If organizations are in doubt over how they should proceed, or if they believe that aspects of the case suggest that the information should not be provided, it said, the DPA should be consulted.
To contact the reporter on this story: Marcus Hoy in Copenhagen at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jimmy H. Koo at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)