Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Chris Marr
July 28 — A team of environmental groups sued to block oil and gas exploration near the Everglades, where they say the use of heavy “thumper trucks” to conduct seismic testing in wetlands would harm endangered wildlife and water resources ( National Resources Defense Council v. National Park Service, M.D. Fla., No. 2:16-cv-00585, 7/27/16 ).
The Natural Resources Defense Council led five other advocacy groups in suing the National Park Service July 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, accusing the service of failing to adequately evaluate environmental impacts of seismic testing in the Big Cypress National Preserve. The park service issued a finding of no significant impact for the testing on May 6.
Although this isn’t the first oil and gas activity inside the preserve—which sits atop the Sunniland oil and gas trend—the plaintiffs said the scale of the plan and testing techniques will lead to more serious ecological harm. The park service gave approval for the Burnett Oil Co. of Texas to conduct testing in a 110-square-mile area of the preserve, including driving 60,000-pound trucks through roadless areas to press vibrating steel plates onto the ground to create seismic waves.
“Oil and gas companies have no place in our national parks and preserves,” said Alison Kelly, a staff attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a written statement announcing the lawsuit. “Oil exploration and development in Big Cypress could push the rare Florida panther toward the brink of extinction, threaten wetlands and safe drinking water for thousands of people, and damage a popular destination for outdoor lovers.”
The preserve serves as a key recharge point for the aquifer that provides drinking water for South Florida. The preserve also provides nearly half of the water flowing into the Everglades National Park to the south, according to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs say the park service’s approval of the seismic testing was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the Administrative Procedure Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the park service’s own regulations.
The park service conducted a 20-month review process before approving Burnett’s plan to use Vibroseis 3-D technology to survey for potential oil and gas reserves in a north-central section of the preserve, according to the park service’s May 6 finding. The service also required mitigation efforts.
This means of seismic testing is a more advanced technology than the traditional method of drilling “shot holes” to place small explosive blasts underground and measuring the sound waves with receivers at the surface, said Ron Clark, chief of natural resources at Big Cypress.
“In our environmental analysis, we concluded this proposed technique was less intrusive than drilling those shot holes, sometimes in the hundreds, sometimes in the thousands, depending on the size of the survey,” Clark told Bloomberg BNA on July 28.
Ray Russo, a geophysics professor at the University of Florida, agreed the Vibroseis testing is preferable to using explosives, partly because explosives can leave chemical residue that affects groundwater. Nevertheless, he said Burnett’s testing plan will require driving lots of large trucks through the preserve, likely in a dense grid to gather an adequate data sample.
“The seismic part is not the problem. It’s driving the truck to get to all of those nodes,” Russo told Bloomberg BNA on July 28. “In my opinion that would be pretty disruptive.”
In reviewing Burnett’s plan, the park service considered not just ecological factors but also property rights, Clark said. When the preserve was established, the federal government bought the surface rights but left mineral rights under private ownership.
“That was a consideration for us too,” Clark said. “How do we allow private property owners to exercise their property rights, and how do we preserve and conserve and protect the natural resources at the same time?”
The park service required a number of mitigation measures in approving the seismic testing, including making certain parts of the 110-square-mile area off limits, requiring protection of vegetation, and requiring that park service staff, an archaeologist and an ecologist be in the field during all testing.
The trucks to be used for testing are equipped with tread-less, balloon-like tires that minimize damage to soil, according to the park service's finding.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit—the NRDC, Center for Biological Diversity, National Park Conservation Association, Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Earthworks and South Florida Wildlands Association—said the park service should have completed a full environmental impact statement for the seismic testing proposal.
Instead, the park service completed a less-stringent environmental assessment that resulted in its finding of no significant impact, according to the complaint.
In addition to the July 27 lawsuit, the plaintiffs also have served a notice of intent to sue the park service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the plaintiffs announced. That case would focus on potential impacts of the seismic testing on endangered and threatened species.
Oil companies have been producing oil within the current territory of the Big Cypress preserve since the 1960s, before it was designated as a national preserve, Clark said.
Companies currently operate 16 wells in two oil fields within the preserve, producing about 30,000 barrels of oil per month, he said. The planned testing would be Burnett’s first venture into the preserve.
Burnett Oil declined to comment on the litigation, according to spokesman Ryan Duffy.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Marr in Atlanta at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)