March 26 --Declaring that “no person should have to sacrifice their life for their livelihood,” Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez defended the Department of Labor's budget and policies during a March 26 hearing before the House Education and the Workforce Committee.
The hearing was Perez's first appearance with the committee since taking office in July 2013.
While much of the two-hour session, with Perez as the only witness, focused on unemployment benefits, job training and retirement programs, Perez faced several questions about the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA issues included farm inspection policies, the decision on which schools can offer online training courses and the ongoing silica rulemaking (see related story).
“I talk to employer after employer who recognize their most precious resource is their human capital; that it is a false choice to suggest that we either have to have job growth or job safety,” Perez told the lawmakers in his opening statement.
The White House requested $11.8 billion for the Labor Department, including $565 million for OSHA.
The hearing was Perez's first for the 2015 budget. He'll likely testify at additional House and Senate hearings.
Congressmen from both parties asked few questions directly concerning the spending plan. Instead, they asked about department policies.
Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), chairman of the committee's Workforce Protections Subcommittee, raised issues about the silica rulemaking.
Walberg told Perez that businessmen have brought up concerns that OSHA's proposed rule will set limits for silica that are too low to be measured.
“How can a regulation be proposed to regulate what cannot be accurately measured?” Walberg asked.
Perez didn't directly answer the congressman's question.
“For decades, literally, we've known the impact of silica,” Perez responded. The secretary pointed out that OSHA is conducting ongoing hearings about the silica rule where all parties are airing their concerns.
“We want to make sure we get it right,” Perez said about the proposed rule.
The silica rule was backed by Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.).
“This is something we still have to work on; we still have to improve,” Holt told Perez about protecting workers.
OSHA's proposal to increase its whistle-blower funding by $4 million to $21 million was raised by Rep. Matt Salmon (R-Ariz.).
Perez said that in addition to boosting whistle-blower funding, he would like Congress to revise older whistle-blower rules so that they offer the same protections and options of the whistle-blower protection laws passed by Congress in recent years.
Salmon asked Perez to consider a whistle-blower law to protect people who work for unions. Perez said the department's Office of Labor-Management Standards already investigates allegations of corrupt practices in unions.
Salmon also asked why OSHA hasn't reopened the process for selecting schools to provide online training courses. The congressman pointed out that in July 2012, a federal judge found the earlier review process wasn't legal and since then OSHA hasn't started a new selection process.
Perez said he hadn't been aware of the problem, which predated his arrival at the department.
OSHA's regulation of farming activities was the focus of questions from Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.).
DesJarlais told Perez that farmers still talk to him about the Labor Department's “ill-conceived and thankfully unsuccessful” effort to enforce safety rules on family farms.
Perez said that the department is following the 2014 budget rider prohibiting OSHA from inspecting small farms.
The secretary added that inspectors may not know if a farm is exempt until they visit the farm. Defining a family farm, Perez said, is “easier said that done.”
Perez added the department wants to promote farm safety, regardless of a farm's size.
“I'm very proud of the preventative work our OSHA is doing,” the secretary said.
DesJarlais also voiced objections to OSHA's February 2013 guidance explaining when inspectors can be accompanied by third-party representatives, including union representatives requested by workers, at inspection sites.
Perez said the guidance didn't create a new policy, instead it clarified a practice in effect prior to the Obama administration.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bruce Rolfsen in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jim Stimson at email@example.com
Details of OSHA's 2015 budget request are available at http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2015/PDF/CBJ-2015-V2-12.pdf.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).