The Labor & Employment Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
by Louis C. LaBrecque
Legislation to strengthen whistleblower protections for federal employees has been introduced in both the House and Senate numerous times over the past 13 years, only to be left without final action from Congress. It's all the more surprising, then, that the latest version of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 743) likely will be approved by federal lawmakers before the end of the turbulent 112th Congress and signed into law by President Obama.
S. 743 as passed by the House Sept. 28 did not include provisions that would give federal whistleblowers the right to jury trials and also left out strengthened protections for national security whistleblowers. But Obama in a presidential policy directive (PPD-19) issued Oct. 10 extended new whistleblower protections to federal national security employees, including employees of the 17 Intelligence Community agencies and those in other agencies who are eligible for access to classified information.
To understand why S. 743 is likely to become law, amending the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 for the first time since 1994, it is instructive to see who in Congress the Government Accountability Project, a prominent whistleblower group based in Washington, D.C., credited for the measure's success. In addition to the bill's sponsor, Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), a long-time supporter of strengthened federal whistleblower rights, the group in a Sept. 28 statement thanked Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and Todd Platts (R-Pa.), who has sponsored the House version of the bill for more than a decade. Other contributors, according to GAP, included House Democrats Chris Van Hollen (Md.) and Elijah Cummings (Md.), Senate Republicans Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Although this disparate group of conservatives, liberals, and moderates do not agree on much, they share a common interest in ensuring that federal employees can speak out without fear of retribution when they see instances of fraud, waste, and abuse. Let's hope the 113th Congress can find other areas of agreement that benefit both taxpayers and federal employees.
In other public sector news:
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Public Sector Roundup: Thrift Board Considers Making Lifestyle Fund New Default Investment for Federal Workers
Labor Stats and Facts: A Closer Look at the Union-Nonunion Pay Gap
Q&A: Implicit Bias Effect on Asian American Workers
EEO Roundup: The Continuing Development of Anti-Retaliation Law
Q&A: When Does an OFCCP Audit Become Litigation Worthy?