The Labor & Employment Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
by Louis C. LaBrecque
President Obama in his fiscal year 2014 budget request, released April 10, proposed a 1 percent pay increase for federal employees, but also called on federal workers hired prior to Jan. 1, 2013, to contribute an additional 1.2 percent of their salaries toward their retirements.
Currently, federal employees hired before Jan. 1 contribute 0.8 percent of their salaries toward their retirements. The proposed increase would mean they would pay a total of 2 percent of their salaries toward their retirements. For a federal employee with an annual salary of $100,000, for example, the change would mean that their annual retirement contribution would increase from $800 to $2,000.
Federal employees hired after Dec. 31, 2012, already are paying 3.1 percent of their salaries toward their retirements under legislation signed by Obama in February 2012. The president's budget proposal would not make changes to the existing pension contributions for these employees.
In addition, the budget proposal would change the way federal retirement increases are calculated through a proposed move to the "chained" consumer price index (CPI), which would affect the way a variety of retirement benefits are calculated. The chained CPI rises more slowly than the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W)--a measure of inflation used by the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics--because it takes changes to consumers' spending habits into account.
The proposals to increase retirement contributions and to move to a chained CPI for calculating retirement increases in particular were panned by a variety of groups representing federal employees and retirees.
"[W]e are troubled that federal employees continue to play a lopsided role in deficit reduction strategies, sending the message that those who serve our nation day in and day out are responsible for our government's spending problem," Patricia Niehaus, president of the Federal Managers Association, said in an April 10 statement.
In other public sector news:
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
Public Sector Roundup: Thrift Board Considers Making Lifestyle Fund New Default Investment for Federal Workers
Labor Stats and Facts: A Closer Look at the Union-Nonunion Pay Gap
Q&A: Implicit Bias Effect on Asian American Workers
EEO Roundup: The Continuing Development of Anti-Retaliation Law
Q&A: When Does an OFCCP Audit Become Litigation Worthy?