The Labor & Employment Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues.
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
by Louis C. LaBrecque
Federal employees in many agencies are facing furloughs--or the possibility of furloughs--in fiscal year 2013 due to sequestration. What's ahead in FY 2014?
The good news, such as it is, is that even if the federal spending cuts called for by the 10-year sequestration process included in 2011's Budget Control Act continue into FY 2014, federal agencies this time around will be better prepared. The bad news is that it does not appear likely that Congress and the president will come up with an alternative to sequestration by the Oct. 1, 2013, beginning of the next fiscal year, meaning that federal agency leaders and employees will continue to face budget constraints.
In fact, it would be surprising if the House and Senate were to agree on regular FY 2014 spending bills for most federal agencies rather than passing a continuing resolution to fund the lion's share of government agencies. Already, Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, appears to be preparing a budget for next year that assumes the continuation of sequestration. His Senate counterpart, Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, is assuming that sequestration will be replaced before the end of FY 2014.
Compared with the current fiscal year, however, federal agencies in FY 2014 will be far more likely to expect and plan for sequestration. As congressional Republicans in particular have pointed out, the White House Office of Management and Budget in a July 2012 memorandum to federal agency heads said "agencies should continue normal spending and operations since more than 5 months remain for Congress to act," with the assumption being that sequestration would not be allowed to take effect as scheduled on Jan. 2, 2013. Although sequestration in the end was postponed until March 1, giving federal agencies even less time to implement the required cuts during the remaining months of FY 2013, agency leaders in the coming fiscal year will know better than to make such an assumption.
In other public sector news:
to post a comment.
Q&A: Statistical Proof of Discrimination Isn't Static
Q&A: Contractors Have No Scapegoat in Third-Party Providers
Long-Awaited, Bigger Pay Raises Are Coming for Most Workers
EEO Roundup: Pregnancy Bias--Two Under-the-Radar Rulings You Might Have Missed
Public Sector Roundup: Civil Service System Needs Overhaul, House Panel Told
Employee Background Checks
Adverse Employment Action
Burden of Proof