The Labor & Employment Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
by Louis C. LaBrecque
Federal employees would be permitted to earn compensatory time off for religious observances within 26 pay periods (52 weeks) of taking the time off under a new proposed rule from the Office of Personnel Management.
Under the proposed rule, published in the Aug. 30 Federal Register, federal employees also would be permitted to earn compensatory time off in anticipation of a future religious observance up to 26 pay periods in advance of the observance, the OPM said.
Employees would be required to provide their agencies with reasonable notice of planned religious observances, and agencies would be permitted to ask employees for documentation of the need for the compensatory time, according to the OPM.
If the employee fails to perform overtime work in exchange for advanced religious compensatory time off within 26 pay periods, the OPM said, the proposed rule provides that "the agency may take corrective action to eliminate or reduce the negative balance by making a corresponding reduction in the employee's annual leave balance." If the employee does not have enough annual leave to make up for the advanced religious compensatory time off, the OPM added, it can charge the employee for leave without pay for the time taken.
Under the proposed rule, agencies would be required to "keep appropriate records on the amount of religious compensatory time off each employee earns and uses," the OPM said.
Comments on the proposed rule are due no later than Oct. 29.
In other public sector news:
You must Sign In or Register to post a comment.
EEO Roundup: Obesity as a Disability—EEOC’s Feldblum Comments
Public Sector Roundup: Administration Told to Insist on Back Pay for Federal Workers If Shutdown Occurs
Public Sector Roundup: Proposed Rule Would Allow Compensatory Time Off for Religious Observances
Q&A: U.S. Multinationals Must Understand Local EEO Issues
Q&A: A Glimpse Into Defending Workers’ Discrimination Claims