Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

Selected Global Antitrust and Competition Law Developments

Monday, August 8, 2011

— U.S. Antitrust Authorities Sign Memorandum of Understanding with Chinese Antitrust Agencies

The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission announced that they have entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with China's three antitrust agencies that is intended to "promote communication and cooperation among the agencies in the two countries." According to the MOU, the agencies will share information regarding competition law and policy, cooperate with respect to agency training programs, share comments on proposed laws and regulations, and, when appropriate, cooperate on specific investigations.

— Dominance of "Big Four" Accounting Firms to be Investigated by U.K. Competition Commission

The U.K. Office of Fair Trading (OFT) announced that it "has provisionally decided to refer the market for statutory audit services to large companies in the UK to the Competition Commission for a market investigation." The OFT has expressed concern that the market is dominated by the "Big Four" accounting firms (PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte and Ernst & Young), that smaller firms face substantial barriers to entry, and that customer switching costs are high. The OFT will make a final decision about whether to refer the matter to the Competition Commission after a six-week consultation period during which interested parties may submit comments for consideration.

— U.K. Competition Appeal Tribunal Confirms that OFT Investigation of Ryanair-Aer Lingus Transaction is Timely

The U.K. Competition Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) was not time-barred from considering referring to the Competition Commission Ryanair Holdings plc's 2006 acquisition of a minority stake in Aer Lingus Group plc. Shortly after Ryanair acquired its minority stake in Aer Lingus, it launched a bid to acquire Aer Lingus in full. The European Commission blocked the merger but held that it did not have the authority to require Ryanair to divest its minority stake. Ryanair appealed the decision blocking the full acquisition and Aer Lingus appealed the decision not to require divestiture of the minority stake. The appeals were rejected and the deadline for further appeal expired in September 2010. In October 2010, the OFT launched an investigation into the minority acquisition. Ryanair challenged the investigation, arguing that the OFT's investigation was untimely because the OFT is required to investigate and decide whether to refer any acquisition within four months of the transaction date. The Tribunal disagreed, explaining that a reference to the Competition Commission could not have been made until after resolution of the EU proceedings, as the OFT has a duty of "sincere cooperation" with the European Union and must avoid the risk of "impermissible conflicts" between EU and U.K. merger decisions. Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the time period for the OFT to investigate and, if appropriate, refer the minority acquisition in this case was tolled during the pendency of the EU proceedings.
Disclaimer This document and any discussions set forth herein are for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice, which has to be addressed to particular facts and circumstances involved in any given situation. Review or use of the document and any discussions does not create an attorney-client relationship with the author or publisher. To the extent that this document may contain suggested provisions, they will require modification to suit a particular transaction, jurisdiction or situation. Please consult with an attorney with the appropriate level of experience if you have any questions. Any tax information contained in the document or discussions is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code. Any opinions expressed are those of the author. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and its affiliated entities do not take responsibility for the content in this document or discussions and do not make any representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. ©2014 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All rights reserved. Bloomberg Law Reports ® is a registered trademark and service mark of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.

To view additional stories from Bloomberg Law® request a demo now